Strategi Kreatif Penulisan Artikel Fiksi Berbantuan ChatGPT: Studi Kualitatif pada Blogger Kompasiana di Kota Semarang

Isna Rosiana Dewi; Viro Dharma Saputra

doi:10.62383/federalisme.v2i3.1070

Authors

Isna Rosiana Dewi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi Semarang
Viro Dharma Saputra Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komunikasi Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v2i3.1070

Keywords:

ChatGPT, digital creativity, extended mind, fiction writing, human-AI collaboration

Abstract

This study aims to examine creative strategies for fiction writing involving collaboration between humans and AI (ChatGPT) in the Kompasiana blogger community in Semarang. Using a qualitative approach, this study collected data through in-depth interviews with four informants active in AI-assisted fiction writing. The interviews revealed a shift in the role of AI, where AI no longer functions solely as a technical tool but rather as an imaginative partner collaborating with writers in the creative process. During the writing process, writers negotiated with AI regarding style and story structure, and reflected deeply on their creative process. They also faced ethical dilemmas, particularly regarding the originality and authenticity of their work, arising from the use of AI technology. While AI writers provided new ideas and inspiration, they also demanded further considerations regarding copyright and author credibility. These findings were analyzed using the theories of Extended Mind, Distributed Cognition, and Reflective Practice to understand the dynamics of human-machine interaction in a creative context. This study proposes a dialectical and symbiotic model of creative interaction, in which writers and AI influence each other in producing fictional works. This model emphasizes that AI-assisted fiction writing is not just about efficiency in producing work, but also a process of redefining creative agency. This research demonstrates how human-machine collaboration in digital literacy can change our perspective on creative roles and ethics in the world of writing. Furthermore, this research explores the impact of AI use on the learning process of writers within the blogging community. AI, in this case ChatGPT, not only contributes to the final product but also plays a role in broadening the writer's insight into writing techniques, idea exploration, and character development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barthes, R. (1967). The death of the author. Aspen, 5–6.

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623). ACM.

Bin Humam, R., Aziz, N. A., & Saeed, A. (2023). Generative AI performance in creative writing tasks: A quantitative study. Journal of Human AI Interaction, 1(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhai.2023.01.003

Cheng, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence–assisted academic writing. Advances in Simulation, 10, e3506. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6

Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Gaut, B. (2007). Art, emotion and ethics. Oxford University Press.

Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Springer.

Haase, J., & Hanel, P. H. P. (2023). Artificial muses: Generative AI chatbots have risen to human level creativity. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12003

Hayles, N. K. (2012). How we think: Digital media and contemporary technogenesis. University of Chicago Press.

Hayles, N. K. (2017). Cognitive assemblages: Technical agency and human interactions. Critical Inquiry, 43(2), 321–348.

Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0173001

Holzner, N., Maier, S., & Feuerriegel, S. (2025). Generative AI and creativity: A systematic literature review and meta analysis. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17241

Kartik, H., & Daehwan, A. (2024). Designing human and generative AI collaboration. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14199

Lee, J. D., See, K. A., & Parasuraman, R. (2022). Generative AI as team member: Exploring trust, agency, and human AI collaboration. Human Factors, 64(5), 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208221083962

Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson.

Li, F., Huang, Z., & Tang, H. (2023). Creative writing with AI: A study of human-AI co authorship. Journal of Creative Technologies, 12(2), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jctech.2023.03.004

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Lindgren, H. (2020). Ethical and creative tensions in algorithmic authorship. AI & Society, 35(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00887-6

Malik, M. A. (2024). Overreliance on ChatGPT undermines student writing skills. Education and Information Technologies. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11582041

McCormack, J., Gifford, T., & Hutchings, P. (2019). Autonomy, authenticity, authorship and intention in computer generated art. Proceedings of Computational Creativity Conference, pp. 9–16.

Niekerk, J. van (2025). Active learning with ChatGPT in academic writing: Experimental results. ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24001450

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Stanford, J. (2025). How disruptive is AI in students’ academic writing. Scholarship in Education, 4(1). https://stel.pubpub.org/pub/04-01-stanford

Stockwell, P. (2009). Texture: A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh University Press.

Werdiningsih, I. (2024). Balancing AI and authenticity: EFL students’ experience with ChatGPT. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2392388. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311983.2024.2392388

Xu, Z. (2025). Patterns and purposes: A cross journal analysis of AI tool usage in academic writing. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00632

Zou, B., Chen, K., & Wang, Y. (2023). Writing with machines: LLM use in digital writing pedagogy. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14742/llt.2023.1.zou