Kewenangan Kurator dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit dalam Perspektif Hukum Bisnis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v3i1.1534Keywords:
Bankruptcy, Business Law, Creditors, Debtors, ReceiverAbstract
Bankruptcy is a legal mechanism used to resolve a debtor's inability to fulfill debt obligations collectively, orderly, and fairly through a court decision. In the Indonesian bankruptcy system, the curator has a central role in managing and settling bankrupt assets to protect the interests of creditors while providing legal certainty for debtors. This study aims to analyze the regulation of the curator's authority in managing and settling bankrupt assets and to examine its implications for the protection of creditors’ and debtors’ rights from a business law perspective. The research method employed is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, conducted through a literature review of various relevant primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results indicate that the curator’s authority is expressly regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, which provides a legal basis for the curator to manage, secure, sell, and distribute bankrupt assets to creditors in accordance with legal provisions. However, in practice, several obstacles remain, such as difficulties in tracking assets, potential conflicts of interest, and a lack of transparency, which may affect the effectiveness of legal protection. Therefore, the professionalism of the curator and the supervision of the supervising judge are crucial factors in ensuring legal certainty, fairness, and efficiency in the bankruptcy process.
Downloads
References
Faudziyyah, L. (2025). Implikasi pembatasan waktu eksekusi jaminan terhadap kedudukan dan hak kreditor separatis dalam Undang-Undang Kepailitan. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(3).
Fuady, M. (1999). Hukum pailit. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Ganindha, R., & Indira, N. P. (2020). Kewenangan kurator dalam eksekusi aset debitor pada kepailitan lintas negara. Arena Hukum, 13(2), 329-347. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01302.8
Hartini, R. (2003). Hukum kepailitan. Bayu Media.
Hoft, J. (2000). Hukum kepailitan di Indonesia (Indonesian bankruptcy law) (K. Mujadi, Ed.). Tata Nusa.
Kale, G. I., & Dharmakusuma, A. G. A. (2015). Syarat kepailitan sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum debitor dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 1-12.
Kharisma, A. P. (2023). Kedudukan hukum kreditor separatis atas jaminan kebendaan milik guarantor yang telah pailit dalam kepailitan debitor pailit. Perspektif, 28(2), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v28i2.850
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Kukus, F. M. (2015). Perlindungan hukum terhadap profesi kurator dalam perkara kepailitan. Lex Privatum, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v3i2.41
Kurniawan, R. (2013). Harmonisasi hukum sebagai perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja pada perusahaan pailit ditinjau dari perspektif Pancasila sila ke lima. Jurnal Wawasan Hukum, 28(1).
Marsanti, A., & Urbanisasi. (2025). Analisis kedudukan dan dampak kepailitan terhadap debitor perorangan: Tinjauan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 dan UU Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 16(1).
Muljadi, K. (2005). Kreditor preferens dan kreditor separatis dalam kepailitan. Pusat Pengkajian Hukum.
Pratama, B. (2014). Kepailitan dalam putusan hakim ditinjau dari perspektif hukum formil dan materil. Jurnal Yudisial, 7(2), 157-172.
Pratama, I. P. Y. P., & Landra, P. T. C. (2019). Perlindungan hukum terhadap kreditor atas penyusutan nilai objek jaminan hak tanggungan dalam perjanjian utang piutang. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.24843/KM.2019.v07.i06.p06
Shubhan, M. H. (2008). Hukum kepailitan: Prinsip, norma, dan praktik di peradilan. Prenada Media.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2009). Hukum kepailitan: Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang kepailitan. Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
