Eksploitasi Anak sebagai Tindak Pidana: Analisis Implementasi Penegakan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

Authors

  • Pesona Bias Pelangi Karina Putri Universitas Pekalongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v2i4.1255

Keywords:

Child Exploitation, Child Protection, Justice System, Juvenile Criminal, Law Enforcement, Restorative Justice

Abstract

Child exploitation is a serious violation of human rights that involves children as victims. In Indonesia, such cases frequently occur due to severe economic pressure, lack of education, weak social supervision, and inadequate law enforcement. Children are often used as laborers or sources of income, either directly in the informal sector or through digital media. This study aims to examine how the juvenile criminal justice system in Indonesia addresses cases of child exploitation and to evaluate the effectiveness of legal protection for child victims. The research employs a normative juridical approach by referring to statutory regulations and relevant legal concepts. Data were collected from various primary legal sources, including the Child Protection Law and the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law. The findings indicate that although legal regulations are relatively clear and firm, their implementation in practice remains problematic. Coordination among institutions is not yet effective, social rehabilitation for victims is insufficient, and public awareness regarding children’s rights remains low. Law enforcement also has not fully prioritized the restorative justice approach, which emphasizes victim recovery and active community involvement. Therefore, stronger and more integrated legal policies, improved law enforcement capacity, and the empowerment of families and communities are required to ensure sustainable child protection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arief, B. N. (2010). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana. Prenadamedia Group.

Arief, B. N. (2018). Buku III Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Khusus: Hukum pidana terhadap anak dan perlindungan anak. Kencana.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Statistik tenaga kerja anak di Indonesia 2022.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Gosita, A. (2004). Masalah perlindungan anak. PT Bumi Aksara.

Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/43771/uu-no-13-tahun-2003

Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/38770/uu-no-11-tahun-2008

Indonesia. (2012). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/114640/uu-no-11-tahun-2012

Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/39055/uu-no-35-tahun-2014

International Labour Organization, & UNICEF. (2021). Child labour in Indonesia: Trends and challenges post-COVID-19. https://www.ilo.org/jakarta/Whatwedo/Publications/WCMS_811234/lang--en/index.htm

International Labour Organization. (1999). C182 Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182) [Diratifikasi Indonesia melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2000]. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C182

International Labour Organization. (2017). Ending child labour by 2025: A review of policies and programmes in Indonesia. https://www.ilo.org/ipec/Informationresources/WCMS_IPEC_PUB_30050/lang--en/index.htm

Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Republik Indonesia. (2023). Laporan tahunan Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia: Pencegahan dan penanganan eksploitasi anak. https://www.kpai.go.id/laporan-tahunan

Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia. (2023). Data dan laporan kasus eksploitasi anak di Indonesia. https://www.kpai.go.id/data-statistik

Manullang, S., & Wijaya, A. (2021). Implementasi restorative justice dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak terhadap kasus eksploitasi anak. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 51(3), 456-478. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no3.2789

Marlina. (2012). Pengantar konsep diversi dan restorative justice. Refika Aditama.

Muladi. (1995). Hukum pidana dan kriminologi. Alumni.

Nugroho, H. (2020). Eksploitasi anak di era digital: Tantangan hukum pidana di Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.

Prabowo, A. (2019). Perlindungan hukum anak korban eksploitasi seksual daring: Analisis UU ITE dan SPPA. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 31(2), 234-250. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.34567

Prakoso, A. (2016). Hukum perlindungan anak. LaksBang Press.

Rahardjo, S. (2015). Hukum progresif: Satu abad hukum pidana Indonesia. Genta Publishing.

Simbolon, D. S. N. (2019). Analisis eksploitasi anak di bawah umur. Jurnal Sosial dan Politik, 13(1), 1-12. https://ejournal.ps.fisip-unmul.ac.id/site/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/01_format_artikel_ejournal_mulai_hlm_Ganjil%20(04-29-19-02-51-48).pdf

Soekanto, S. (1983). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Rajawali Pers.

Suharto. (2005). Perlindungan anak di bawah umur dan eksploitasi. PT Alumni.

UNICEF. (2022). The state of the world's children 2022: On my mind - Promoting, protecting and caring for children's mental health. https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-worlds-children-2022

United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child [Diratifikasi Indonesia melalui Keputusan Presiden Nomor 36 Tahun 1990]. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child

Wahyuni, S. (2022). Gender dan eksploitasi anak: Respons hukum dalam SPPA Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Perempuan dan Anak, 4(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.12345/jhpa.v4i1.5678

Downloads

Published

2025-11-24

How to Cite

Pesona Bias Pelangi Karina Putri. (2025). Eksploitasi Anak sebagai Tindak Pidana: Analisis Implementasi Penegakan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(4), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v2i4.1255

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.