Strengthening Ethical Codes to Prevent Discretion Misuse and Preserve Public Trust in Law Enforcement Practices

Dicki Agri Kurniawan; Megawati Barthos

doi:10.62383/federalisme.v2i3.1051

Authors

Dicki Agri Kurniawan Universitas Borobudur
Megawati Barthos Universitas Borobudur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v2i3.1051

Keywords:

Discretion, Investigator, Police Code of Ethics, Republic of Indonesia Police

Abstract

This study examines the role of discretion exercised by law enforcement officers, especially within the context of criminal investigations. Discretion refers to the authority granted to investigators, prosecutors, and judges to make decisions that are not always explicitly regulated by written laws or regulations. It is granted to allow flexibility in addressing situations that require quick, context-specific decisions. Discretion is necessary because not every legal situation can be anticipated in advance by the law, especially in dynamic and unpredictable situations that law enforcement professionals encounter daily. However, the exercise of discretion must be grounded in the core principles of justice, legal certainty, and respect for human rights, ensuring that decisions are made fairly and in accordance with legal norms. While discretion allows law enforcement officers to exercise judgment and adapt to diverse situations, it also carries significant risks, particularly the potential for abuse of power. Such abuse could manifest in inappropriate criminalization of innocent individuals, discriminatory practices, or biased decisions that undermine the legitimacy of the justice system. The possibility of such negative consequences necessitates a careful and responsible approach to the application of discretion. Law enforcement officers must not only act in accordance with the law but also adhere to ethical standards and ensure that their decisions are made transparently and equitably. Therefore, the study emphasizes the need for strict oversight and the development of clear, consistent guidelines to govern the exercise of discretion. Supervision mechanisms, such as internal audits and external oversight bodies, are crucial in monitoring law enforcement activities and ensuring that officers do not misuse their powers. Furthermore, providing adequate training to law enforcement personnel on the ethical and legal boundaries of discretion is vital in preventing arbitrary or unjust decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, D. (2016). Hubungan pemerintah pusat dengan pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 1(1), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v1i1.501

Ahmad, M. R. (2022). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TEMBAK DI TEMPAT OLEH APARAT KEPOLISIAN DALAM MENJALANKAN TUGAS PENINDAKAN PELAKU NARKOBA DI INDONESIA. LEX ADMINISTRATUM, 10(6).

Akbar, A. A., & Mardany, A. F. (2024). DISKRESI PENAHANAN TERSANGKA DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA BERDASARKAN ASAS KEADILAN. Law Jurnal, 4(1), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v4i1.4191

Ansori, L. (2015). Diskresi dan Pertanggungjawaban Pemerintah dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. Jurnal Yuridis, 2(1), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.35586/.v2i1.165

Eddyono, S. W., & Napitupulu, E. (2014). Prospek Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan dalam Pengawasan Penahanan Dalam Rancangan KUHAP.

Hasibuan, E. S., & SH, M. H. (2021). Hukum kepolisian dan criminal policy dalam penegakan hukum. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Juliani, H. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Kebijakan Keuangan Negara dalam Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19 Melalui Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2020. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 3(2), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i2.329-348

Laksana, A. W. (2017). Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 4(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v4i1.1644

Latunussa, S. B., & Tamher, S. (2021). Analisis Kewenangan Diskresional Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Dalam Penindakan Penyidikan Pidana Khusus. Jurnal Ius Publicum, 3(3), 60-78. https://doi.org/10.55551/jip.v3i3.23

Leksono, B. B., Wibowo, A., & Mashari, M. (2024). Kepolisian dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana terhadap Tindak Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT, 22(2), 189-205.

Lobubun, M., Raharusun, Y. A., & Anwar, I. (2022). Inkonsistensi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(2), 294-322. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i2.294-322

Mahardika, A. (2020). Potensi Penyimpangan Hukum Dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2020. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27(2), 264-284. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art3

Marfungah, M., Rochaeti, N., & Wisaksono, B. (2017). Praktik Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencurian Di Polrestabes Semarang. Diponegoro Law Journal, 6(3), 1-17.

Munib, M. A. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis Kewenangan Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Dalam Penyelidikan Dan Penyidikan Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Justitiable-Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 60-73.

Noor, R. (2017). EKSISTENSI PERSETUJUAN TERTULIS PRESIDEN UNTUK PEMANGGILAN ANGGOTA DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT PADA TAHAP PENYIDIKAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF ASAS EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW. Badamai Law Journal, 2(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v2i1.3388

Pandelaki, G. R. (2018). Peran Polisi Dalam Pengendalian Massa Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Lex Et Societatis, 6(5), 157-169.

Ramadhan, A. (2021). Diskresi Penyidik Polri Sebagai Alternatif Penanganan Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 6(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss1.art3

Rini, N. S. (2018). Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Administrasi Dalam Undang Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(2), 257-274. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.257-274

Said, A. (2012). TOLAK UKUR PENILAIAN PENGGUNAAN DISKRESI OLEH POLISI DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.1.2012.147-170

Saputra, F., Kalo, S., Mulyadi, M., & Hamdan, M. (2014). Analisis Yuridis Penerbitan Surat Perintah Penghentian Penuntutan oleh Kejaksaan Dikaitkan dengan Asas Oportunitas dan Undang-undang No 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan RI. USU Law Journal, 2(1), 105-123.

Sutrisno, S., Puluhulawa, F., & Tijow, L. M. (2020). Penerapan Asas Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Putusan Hakim Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Gorontalo Law Review, 3(2), 168-187.