Keterlibatan Artificial Intelligence sebagai Katalisator Perancangan Putusan Perkara Perdata di Indonesia

Alexandro Wiranto Tambe; Amiradiaty Nasution; Nabila Fitria Almadea

doi:10.62383/federalisme.v2i2.568

Authors

Alexandro Wiranto Tambe Universitas Padjadjaran
Amiradiaty Nasution Universitas Padjadjaran
Nabila Fitria Almadea Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v2i2.568

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, civil procedure, court decision

Abstract

AI has been widely used in various nations, especially in the economy, healthcare, and law. However, its current state is limited to weak AI, lacking full awareness and control. Some countries use AI to assist legal professionals in analyzing legal documents and in helping judges with research during court proceedings. Thus, exploring AI's role and regulation in making civil case decisions within Indonesian law is crucial. This study relies on secondary data and normative legal methods. Findings suggest weak AI is promising for crafting judgments in Indonesian civil cases due to its focus on formal truth. Implementing regulations, possibly Supreme Court Regulations (PERMA), is necessary for the possible use of AI in Indonesia's court proceedings. These rules should define, classify, and limit AI, ensuring legal reliability in its application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amalia, E. I. (2023). Kenapa Regulasi AI Diperlukan?. hybrid.co.id. Available at: https://hybrid.co.id/post/kenapa-regulasi-ai-diperlukan, diakses tanggal 21 Agustus 2023.

Amiruddin dan Asikin, Z. (2018). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Anshori. (2022). Gagasan Artificial Intelligence dalam Penerapan Hukum di Era 4.0 Perspektif Penyelesaian Perkara Model Restorasi Justice dan Hukum Progresif. Legal Studies Journal, 2(2), 1-13. https://ejournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/lsj/article/view/4190/1646.

Apeldoorn, L. J. V. (2011). Inleiding tot de Studie van Het Nederlandse recht diterjemahkan Oetarid Sadino, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Pradya Paramita.

Aryati, R., Vensur, H., & Febrianto, M. (2022). Sejarah Berlakunya BW dan KUHPerdata di Indonesia. Journal of Criminology and Justice. 2(1), 11-16. https://www.journal.fkpt.org/index.php/criminology/article/view/422/272.

Bhora, D & Shravan, K. (2019). Demystifying the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Legal Practice, Nirma University Law Journal, 8(2), 1-19. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3443000.

Butarbutar, E. N. (2010) Arti Pentingnya Pembuktian dalam Proses Penemuan Hukum di Peradilan Perdata. Mimbar Hukum, 22(2), 347-259. https://www.neliti.com/publications/40536/arti-pentingnya-pembuktian-dalam-proses-penemuan-hukum-di-peradilan-perdata.

Clarke, L. (2021). The EU’s leaked AI regulation is ambitious but disappointingly vague. Tech Monitor. Availabel at https://techmonitor.ai/policy/eu-ai-regulation-machine-learning-european-union, diakses tanggal 3 Agustus 2023.

Debnath, S., Sen, S., & Blackstock, B. (2000). Law BOT: A Multiagent Assistant for Legal Research. Journal Internet Computing Online. 6, 32-37. http://csdl.computer.org/comp/mags/ic/2000/06/w6032abs.htm.

Dennis J. Baker dan Paul H, Robinson. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York: Routledge 2 Park Square, Malton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN.

Fachri, F. K. (2023). Law Firm Ini Klaim yang Pertama Gunakan Generative AI. Hukumonline. Available at https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/law-firm-ini-klaim-jadi-yang- pertama-gunakan-generative-ai-lt63ff1a9988d95. diakses tanggal 3 Agustus 2023.

Haris, M. T. A. R., & Tantimin. (2022). Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum. 8(1), 307-316. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369115282_ANALISIS_PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN_HUKUM_PIDANA_TERHADAP_PEMANFAATAN_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_DI_INDONESIA/link/640a7dcca1b72772e4e58087/download?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau. (1999). The Social Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kadam, T. (202). China’s AI-Enabled ‘Smart Courts’ To Recommend Laws & Draft Legal Docs; Judges To Take Consult AI Before Verdict. The Eurasian Times. Available at: https://www.eurasiantimes.com/chinas-ai-enabled-smart-court-to-recommend-laws-judges/. Diakses tanggal 20 Agustus 2023.

Katherine B. Forrest. (2021). When Machines Can Be Judge, Jury, and Executioner. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte.Ltd.

Kurniawijaya, A, Yudityastri, I, & Zuama, A. P. C. (2021). Pendayagunaan Artificial Intelligence dalam Perancangan Kontrak Serta Dampaknya Bagi Sektor Hukum di Indonesia. Khatulistiwa Law Review, 2(2), 260-279. https://e-journal.iainptk.ac.id/index.php/khalrev/article/view/108/138.

Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administratif Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan secara Elektronik.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2023). Catatan Menyongsong Tahun 2023 Mahkamah Agung: Integritas Tangguh, Kepercayaan Publik Tumbuh. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Diakses daro https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/artikel/5582/catatan-menyongsong-tahun- 2023-mahkamah-agung-integritas-tangguh-kepercayaan-publik-tumbuh.

Mertokusumo S. (2018). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Muneza, A. & Mustapha, Z. (2020). The Potential of Fintech in Enhancing the Use of Salam Contract in Islamic Banking. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance (IJIEF), 3(2), 305-334. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343266013_The_Potential_of_Fintech_in_Enhancing_the_Use_of_Salam_Contract_in_Islamic_Banking.

Nada R. Sanders dan John D. Wood. (2020). The Humachin: Humankind, Machines, and the Future of Enterprise. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Oetarid Sadino. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Pradya Paramita

Pakpahan, R. (2021). Analisa Pengaruh Implementasi Artificial Intelligence Dalam Kehidupan Manusia. Journal of Information System, Informatics and Computing, 5(2), 506-513. https://journal.stmikjayakarta.ac.id/index.php/jisicom/article/view/616.

Pandiangan, H. J. (2017). Perbedaan Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Pidana dan Perdata. Jurnal Hukum tô-râ, 3(2), 1-19. https://ejournal.uki.ac.id/index.php/tora/article/view/1154.

Pangaribuan. L. M. P., (2013). Hukum Acara Pidana. cet. Ke-1, Jakarta: Djambatan.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan secara Elektronik

Schaake M.,(2022). The European Commission’s Artificial Intelligence Act. Issue Brief: The European Commission's Artificial Intelligence Act, hlm. 3.

Shi, C., Sourdin, T., & Li, B. (2021). The Smart Court – A New Pathway to Justice in China?. International Journal For Court Administration. 12(1), 1-19. https://iacajournal.org/articles/10.36745/ijca.367.

Soekanto, S. & Mamudji. S. (1995). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soekanto, S. (2015). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI-Press.

Sureden, H. (2014). Machine Learning and Law. Washington Law Review, 8(1), 87-115. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2417415.

Tjahyanti, L. P. A, S., Saputra, P. S., & Gitakarma, M. S. (2022). Peran Artificial Intelligence (AI) Untuk Mendukung Pembelajaran di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Komputer dan Teknologi Sains (KOMTEKS). 1(1), 15-21. https://ejournal.unipas.ac.id/index.php/Komteks/article/view/1062/791.

Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Pokok-Pokok Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Undang

Uni Eropa Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), 2016.

W. H. Freeman and Co. (2023). Discussing the use of computers to automate judicial decision making. W.H. Freeman and Co. Available at http://www.ipma-wa.com/news/1977/197707.html, diakses tanggal 2 Agustus 2023.

Wang, N & Tian, M. Y. (2022). Intelligent Justice: human‐centered considerations in China’s legal AI transformation. Springer journal. 3(1), 1-6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362873384_Intelligent_Justice_human-centered_considerations_in_China's_legal_AI_transformation.

Wangol, W. A. (2016). Asas Peradilan Sederhana Cepat dan Biaya Ringan dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Menurut KUHAP. Lex Privatum, 4(7), 39-45. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/13243.

Waqar, M. (2022). The Use of AI in Arbitral Proceedings. Ohio State Journal On Dispute Resolution. 37(3), 1-16. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3931233.

Wei, L. (2018). Legal Risk and Criminal Imputation of Weak Artificial Intelligence. IOP Conference Science: Materials Science and Engineering, 490(6), 1-6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332386597_Legal_risk_and_criminal_imputation_of_weak_artificial_intelligence.

Welle, D. (2023). How China's AI is automating the legal system. Taiwan News. Available at: https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4787354, diakses tanggal 9 Agustus 2023.

Wodecki, B. (2022). AI helps judges decide court cases in China. AI Bussiness. Available at https://aibusiness.com/verticals/ai-helps-judges-decide-court-cases-in-china, diakses tanggal 20 Agustus 2023.

Zhabina. A. (2023). How China's AI is automating the legal system. Deutsche Welle. Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/how-chinas-ai-is-automating-the-legal-system/a- 64465988. diakses tanggal 10 Agustus 2023.

Zheng, G. G. (2020). China’s Grand Design of People’s Smart Courts. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(3), 561-582. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346859048_China's_Grand_Design_of_People's_Smart_Courts.