Perpindahan Pemeliharaan Anak yang belum Mumayyiz Kepada Ayah Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam
(Studi Putusan No. 1882/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Mdn)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/konstitusi.v2i3.907Keywords:
Hadhanah, Non-Mumayyiz Child, Compilation of Islamic Law, Best Interests of the ChildAbstract
This study examines the transfer of custody (hadhanah) rights of a non-mumayyiz child to the father, as decided in Judicial Decision No. 1882/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Mdn by the Medan Religious Court. According to Article 105 letter (a) of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), the custody of a child under the age of 12 (non-mumayyiz) is generally granted to the mother. However, in this case, the court ruled otherwise. The focus of this research is to analyze the legal reasoning and judicial considerations behind this deviation from normative provisions. This is a normative legalresearch employing a juridical and conceptual approach. Primary data include statutory provisions and the official court ruling, while secondary data are derived from classical Islamic jurisprudence, modern legal commentaries, and related literature. The analysis uses descriptive-analytical methods to examine the legal basis, fiqh arguments, and the principle of maslahah al-mahdhun (best interests of the child). The findings indicate that the court transferred custody to the father on the grounds that the mother had remarried and was experiencing psychological instability, which could endanger the child’s well-being. The decision was based on Article 156 letter (c) of the KHI, which allows custody to be transferred if the mother fails to guarantee the child’s physical and mental safety. The judge also considered the father's financial capability, emotional stability, and supportive environment as decisive factors in ensuring the child's best interests. This research concludes that child custody in Islamic law is flexible and adaptive, prioritizing the child’s welfare over formal legal entitlements. It also highlights the role of religious court jurisprudence in aligning Islamic legal norms with contemporary social realities.
Downloads
References
Abu Dawud (n.d.). Sunan Abi Dawud, Hadis No. 2276
Al-Bukhari, M. I. (2002). Sahih al-Bukhari. Beirut: Dar Ibn Kathir. Hadis No. 893, Kitab al-Ahkam.
Al-Nawawi, Y. (2005). Syarh Sahih Muslim. Kairo: Dar al-Hadits.
Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. (2006). Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Dirjen Bimas Islam.
Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. (2012). Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Cet. ke-3, Edisi Revisi). Bandung: CV. Nuansa Aulia
Departemen Agama RI. (2006). Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Dirjen Bimas Islam.
Harlina, Y., & Asiyah, S. (2020). Putusan hakim pengadilan agama Pekanbaru tentang hadhanah pasca perceraian menurut perspektif hukum Islam. Jurnal An-Nahl.
Imtihanah, A. H. (2021). Hak hadhanah anak yang belum mumayyiz kepada ayah kandung perspektif hukum Islam. Jurnal Antologi Hukum.
Izza, A. (2023). Tinjauan hukum terhadap pengasuhan anak di bawah umur oleh ayah pasca perceraian.
Jafar, M. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis hak asuh anak setelah perceraian menurut KHI. Rechtsnormen Journal.
Kencana. (2006). Perkembangan Hukum Islam dari Fiqh, UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 sampai KHI. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Pasal 98, 105, 156)
Kompilasi Hukum Islam. (2006). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam, Departemen Agama RI.
Mushthofa, R. Z. (2019). Implementasi Pasal 149(d) Kompilasi Hukum Islam tentang biaya hadhanah. Ummul Qura Journal.
Nawawi, I. (1991). al-Majmū‘ Syarḥ al-Muhadzdzab. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Nawawi, Y. (n.d.). al-Majmū‘ Syarḥ al-Muhadzdzab. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Pengadilan Agama Medan. (2019). Putusan No. 1882/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Mdn. Medan.
Putusan No. 1882/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Mdn
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Medan No. 1882/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Mdn.
Rohmah, S. R. S., & Fakhrurazi, F. (2023). Hadhanah akibat perceraian perspektif fiqh dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Jurnal Keluarga Islam Indonesia.
Sabiq, S. (1978). Fiqh Sunnah, Bandung: Al-Ma'arif.
Sabiq, S. (2001). Fiqh as-Sunnah (Juz 2). Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Sabiq, S. (2021). Fiqih Sunnah. Jakarta: Pena Pundi Aksara.
Syeikh Abu Abdullah bin Abd al-salam ‘Alussy,Ibanah Al-Ahkam Syarah Bulugh Al-Maram (Terjemahan: Ibanatu Al-Ahkam Syarhu Bulughu Al-Maram)Jilid 3. (Al-Hidayah Publication (Penerbit Asal; Dar Al-Harmain, Jeddah):2010).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak.
UU No. 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak
Wahbah al-Zuhaili. (1985). al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu (Vol. 7). Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr.
Zainuddin, F. (2023). Perspektif Hukum Islam terhadap Tanggungjawab (Hadhanah) kepada Anak ketika Orang Tua Bercerai. Al-Adillah: Jurnal Hukum Islam.
Zuhaili, W. (1989). Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuh, Jilid VII. Darul Fikr.
Zuhaili, W. (2007). al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu (Jilid 10). Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr.
Zulfami, A., Farida, A., & Trisnawati, I. (2023). Hak anak pasca perceraian perspektif UU No. 16/2019 dan KHI. IJSH, 2(1),
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



