Analisis Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencurian Uang ATM oleh Petugas Pengisi Uang di Kota Batam Menggunakan Routine Activity Theory (RAT)

Authors

  • Mohd. Kharris Maulana Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • M. Khasali Hakim Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v2i4.1167

Keywords:

Criminal Law, Criminal Offenses, Routine Activity Theory (RAT), Theft, Work Access Abuse

Abstract

The research entitled Analysis of ATM Money Theft Crimes by ATM Cashiers in Batam City Using Routine Activity Theory (RAT) focuses on describing the elements of theft crimes, the threat of theft crimes, and cases of ATM money theft by ATM cashiers in Batam City. The research method used a normative legal research method with a case approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study are as follows: The crime of theft is a crime against property as regulated in Chapter XXII of Book II of the Criminal Code, specifically Article 362, which contains subjective and objective elements. The types include ordinary theft, aggravated theft, and petty theft. The occurrence of theft is influenced by internal factors, such as the perpetrator's intention, and external factors, such as circumstances that support the crime. In the case of theft by ATM cash replenishment officers, the crime was committed through abuse of work access (special access crime). Based on Routine Activity Theory (RAT), crime occurs due to three main elements, namely a motivated perpetrator, a suitable target, and a lack of adequate supervision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arasjid, C. (2020). Dasar-dasar ilmu hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1987). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589

Hamzah, A. (2017). Delik-delik tertentu (Speciale delicten) di dalam KUHP. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Herlina, R., & Untung, S. (2022). Tren kejahatan begal sepeda di wilayah hukum Polda Metro Jaya pada masa pandemi Covid-19 berdasarkan teori aktivitas rutin. Jurnal Anomie, 4(1), 33–41.

Kansil, C. S. T., & Kansil, C. C. T. (2020). Pokok-pokok hukum pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Pradnya Paramita.

Lamintang, P. A. F. (1990). Hukum pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Lamintang, P. A. F., & Lamintang, T. (2009). Delik-delik khusus: Kejahatan terhadap harta kekayaan (Edisi kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Maramis, F. (2013). Hukum pidana umum dan tertulis di Indonesia (Cetakan ke-2). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Moeljatno. (1984). Asas-asas hukum pidana (Cetakan ke-2). Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Prayudi, R. (2021). Perkembangan tindak pidana pencurian di Indonesia. Jurnal Pahlawan, 3(2), 45–52.

Prodjodikoro, W. (2010). Tindak-tindak pidana tertentu di Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Simons, J. (2015). Pengantar dalam hukum pidana Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Soesilo, R. (2019). Kitab undang-undang hukum pidana (KUHP) serta komentar-komentarnya lengkap pasal demi pasal. Bogor: Politeia.

Sudarto. (2006). Hukum pidana I: Pengantar hukum pidana Indonesia. Semarang: Yayasan Sudarto.

TVOneNews. (2024, Mei 3). Curi uang Rp11 miliar untuk judi online, petugas pengisian mesin ATM ditangkap polisi. TVOne News. https://www.tvonenews.com/daerah/sumatera/222102-curi-uang-rp11-miliar-untuk-judi-online-petugas-pengisian-mesin-atm-ditangkap-polisi?page=2.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-14

How to Cite

Mohd. Kharris Maulana, & M. Khasali Hakim. (2025). Analisis Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencurian Uang ATM oleh Petugas Pengisi Uang di Kota Batam Menggunakan Routine Activity Theory (RAT). Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 2(4), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v2i4.1167

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.