Peran Putusan Sela dan Putusan Akhir dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Prosedural di Pengadilan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v2i3.694Keywords:
Interlocutory Decision, Final Decision, Procedural Justice, Justice SystemAbstract
Interlocutory decisions and final decisions are two forms of court decisions that have strategic functions in ensuring the application of the principles of procedural justice. In Indonesian judicial practice, procedural irregularities, norm inconsistencies, and lack of transparency often occur which hinder the achievement of legal justice. This research aims to analyze the role and position of interlocutory decisions and final decisions in the Indonesian judicial system, and identify normative and practical obstacles faced in their implementation. The type of research used is normative juridical with conceptual and statutory approaches. The results showed that regulatory weaknesses, low quality of judicial consideration, and limited access to information were the main obstacles in realizing procedural justice. Therefore, it is recommended to harmonize procedural laws, increase the capacity of judges, and digitize open decisions to ensure effective, transparent, and dignified justice in the national justice system.
Downloads
References
Amal, B., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2022). Dinamika ketatanegaraan pemindahan Ibu Kota Negara Indonesia dalam perspektif hukum. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(4), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.4.2022.346-354
Erick Sambuari Lie. (n.d.). Asas-asas hukum acara dan perlindungan hak tersangka. Jurnal Konstitusi Indonesia.
Halili, H., Hartini, S., & Arpannudin, I. (2018). Kinerja Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam mewujudkan electoral justice pada pilkada serentak tahun 2017. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 15(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v15i2.20647
Lailam, T. (2023). Rekonstruksi kewenangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan sela. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 20(2), 77–94.
Muchsin. (2004). Kekuasaan kehakiman yang merdeka & kebijakan asasi. STIH IBLAM.
Nahar, W. A. (2021). Efektivitas E-Court dalam penyelesaian perkara perdata untuk mewujudkan asas peradilan sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan di Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto. Syntax Transformation, 2(1), 118–128. http://jurnal.syntaxtransformation.co.id/index.php/jst/article/view/253
Nganro, A. S. (n.d.). Independensi dan akuntabilitas hakim Pengadilan Tipikor dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia.
Primadewi, A., & Rahmawati, C. (2024). Systems strategic planning with the Ward and Peppard framework (Case study of research data and innovation in Magelang City). E3S Web of Conferences, 500, 01014. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450001014
Rais, M. (2017). Nilai keadilan putusan hakim pada perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan, 6(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v6i1.4870
Runtu, G. M. C. (2024). Prosedur pelaksanaan eksekusi putusan pengadilan dalam perkara perdata. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum UNSRAT, 12(4), 1–12.
Simarmata, A., Harahap, R., & Siregar, H. (2020). Sistem audit digital untuk meningkatkan akuntabilitas dalam pengawasan publik. Jurnal Manajemen Publik, 10(1), 67–75.
Tanto, L. (2024). Peranan hakim dalam mewujudkan peradilan yang adil: Perspektif teori due process of law. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 21(1), 41–63.
Yogi. (2023). Peran putusan sela dan putusan akhir dalam mewujudkan keadilan prosedural di pengadilan. Naskah Jurnal Hukum Tata Peradilan Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
