Analisis Delik Culpa dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana atas Kelalaian Pejabat Negara dalam Perkara Korupsi melalui Studi Putusan  68/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN Jkt Pst.

Dian Rusmana; Numan Sofari Hafid; Syahrul Anwar

doi:10.62383/mahkamah.v2i4.1333

Authors

Dian Rusmana Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati
Numan Sofari Hafid Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati
Syahrul Anwar Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v2i4.1333

Keywords:

Accountability, Corruption Crime, Doctrine, Gross Negligence, State Officials

Abstract

This study seeks to unravel the complexities of applying the doctrine of culpa lata or gross negligence as the basis for criminal liability for state officials in corruption cases, an area that highlights gaps in the criminal law framework which tends to focus on intent. With the rise in corruption cases stemming from misguided strategic decisions that are difficult to prove as intentional, the urgency to explore alternative criminal liability grounds becomes crucial for establishing strong accountability in governance. This research specifically analyzes the application of culpa lata through an in-depth study of Decision Number 68/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN Jkt Pst. Adopting a normative-empirical qualitative case study method, the analysis focuses on the court decision as a single unit of analysis, supported by primary data from the decision document and secondary data from legal literature. Through documentary evidence tracking, it was found that the panel of judges successfully applied the doctrine of culpa lata by identifying elements of negligence such as the disregard for risks that should have been known, subjective asset valuation, and strategic decision-making without adequate study, which causally led to state losses. These findings substantively show that gross negligence can effectively serve as a basis for criminal liability, indicating a shift in the pattern of corruption law enforcement that goes beyond proving mere intent. In conclusion, this study affirms the effectiveness of culpa lata in expanding the scope of criminal liability for state officials, offering theoretical contributions to the understanding of fault elements and practical implications in strengthening public accountability and the potential for corruption prevention through enhanced standards of caution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashworth, A. (2013). Principles of criminal law (7th ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199672684.001.0001

Dewi, A. (2019). Penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam perspektif tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v1i1.4

Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1996). The economic structure of corporate law. Harvard University Press.

Eddyono, S. W. (2011). Pembebanan pembuktian terbalik dan tantangannya. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 8(2).

Gardner, T. J., & Anderson, T. M. (2000). Criminal law: Principles and cases. Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

Harianto, B. (2025). Kerugian negara diakibatkan oleh Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) sebagai kerugian keuangan negara: Penelitian. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 3(4), 3899–3905. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v3i4.1184

Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law (1st ed.). Clarendon Press.

Herwibowo, B. H., Maryano, M., & Mau, H. A. (2025). Kepastian hukum kewenangan diskresi direksi BUMN dalam perspektif prinsip good corporate governance. Cendekia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, 2(8), 1491–1503. https://doi.org/10.62335/cendekia.v2i8.1662

Index, C. P. (2022). Transparency International, Corruption perceptions index. https://www.transparency.org/cpi2021

Kenedi, J. (2017). Buku kebijakan hukum pidana (Penal policy) dalam sistem penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Pustaka Pelajar.

Lamintang, P. A. F. (1997). Dasar-dasar hukum pidana Indonesia (Cet. III). Citra Aditya Bakti.

Lim, E. W. K. (2021). Concentrated ownership, state-owned enterprises, and corporate governance. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 41(3), 663–691. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa050

Moeljatno. (2015). Asas-asas hukum pidana (I). Rineka Cipta.

Peraturan Menteri Nomor: PER/01/M.PAN/01/2002 tentang penerapan prinsip-prinsip good corporate governance dalam penyelenggaraan kegiatan usaha BUMN, Pub. L. No. PER/01/M.PAN/01/2002 (2002).

Prakasa, A. W., & Sudarwanto, A. S. (2025). Doktrin fiduciary duty: Peranannya sebagai pedoman pengurusan perseroan terbatas oleh direksi. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(2), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i2.993

Pramagitha, P. A., Sukranatha, A. A. K., P., & Terbatas, P. (2019). Prinsip business judgment rule sebagai upaya perlindungan terhadap keputusan bisnis direksi BUMN. Journal Ilmu Hukum, 7(12), 1–14.

Putusan Nomor 68/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN. Jkt Pst, Pub. L. No. 68/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN. Jkt Pst, 1255 (2025).

Rabbiefashya, M. A., & Yusuf, H. (2025). Kedudukan barang bukti dalam pembuktian perkara pidana menurut KUHAP. Jurnal Intelek dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 2(5), 9433–9444.

Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139962933

Satria, H. (2018). Pembuktian kesalahan korporasi dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 4(2), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v4i2.255

Sinurat, A. (2023). Asas-asas hukum pidana materil di Indonesia (Cet. I). Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Nusa Cendana Kupang.

Siswantari, P. (2024). Analisis penerapan prinsip business judgment rule terkait dengan pertanggungjawaban pidana pada direksi badan usaha milik negara (BUMN). Yustisi: LPPM Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor, 11(2), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v11i2.16690

Sjawie, H. F., & SH, L. L. M. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi pada tipikor. Prenada Media.

Sofian, A. (2018). Ajaran kausalitas hukum pidana. Prenada Media.

Subramanian, A., & Chakrabarti, R. (2011). Power, compensation, and corruption: Theory and evidence. Available at SSRN 1915772. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1915772

Syaflizar, L. P. (2020). Tanggung jawab direksi atas kerugian dalam pengelolaan BUMN (Persero) berdasarkan prinsip business judgment rule.

Syofyan, E. (2021). Good corporate governance (GCG). Unisma Press.

Tanjung, N. G. A. (2022). Kausalitas penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi terhadap stabilitas keuangan negara. "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 2(3), 28.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi, Pub. L. No. 20 Tahun 2001 (2001).