Reformasi Kelembagaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menjaga Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Authors

  • Sulis Fauziah UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v2i2.542

Keywords:

independence, judicial power, Constitutional Court Decision

Abstract

This article discusses how the independence of the judiciary is based on the Constitutional Court Decision. The obligation of a state of law or rechstaat is the independence of the judiciary. In the concept of Rule of Law and Rechstaat, a state of law is obliged to place a free and impartial judiciary against anyone. The judiciary is also called the broadest possible independence, this is meant as a sign of a good state of law. Independence is usually considered as protection from irresponsible actions. Therefore, in accordance with the mandate of Article 24 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, it is necessary to explore the roots of the independence of the judiciary. The opinion of the Constitutional Court itself regarding the decisions that make this Article a kind of test for the judicial review carried out by the Constitutional Court which should be properly discussed and raised as an interpretation of the meaning of the independence of the judiciary. This article discusses the judge's perspective on the decision of the Constitutional Court which discusses the independence of the judiciary. The writing of normative juridical uses a conceptual approach and a case approach. Secondary data is used in this article, and the main legal source is the Decision of the Constitutional Court. Data were analyzed using a qualitative approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Edi Subiyanto Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl Medan Merdeka Barat No, A. (2012). Mendesain Kewenangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Setelah Perubahan UUd 1945.

Hakim, M. R. (2018). TAFSIR INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI / INTERPRETATION OF JUDICIAL POWER INDEPENDENCE IN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISIONS. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(2), 279. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.279-296

hanum latifah, N. (n.d.). Keberadaan mahkamah Konstitusi_2017.

jailani, sofyan. (n.d.). 360-Article Text-1127-1-10-20151023.

Jumiati, A., Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi, I., & Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Yang Terkait Dengan Kewenangannya Agatha Jumiati, I. (2019). [WACANA HUKUM: JURNAL FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS SLAMET RIYADI] (Vol. 25, Issue 2).

Luhukay, R. S. (n.d.). INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN PASCA AMANDEMEN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR TAHUN 1945 DAN RELEVANSINYA BAGI PENEGAKAN HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN DI INDONESIA.

malik. (n.d.). Kedua perkembangan tersebut.

Margi, S., & Khazanah, M. (n.d.). Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Kelembagaan Negara (Vol. 25).

Nurfitra Mubarok, E., & Al Hadad, A. (2021). PENGAWASAN TERHADAP HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI: PERSPEKTIF TEORI CHECKS AND BALANCES DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN. Khazanah Hukum, 3(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v3i1

puspitasari hastuti, sri. (n.d.). 1059-Article Text-1777-1894-10-20110528.

Qolyubby, B. K. N., & Hadi, S. (2024). Pengaturan Kedudukan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi di dalam Sistem Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 3(3), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v3i3.1359

Sekretariat Jenderal KY. (n.d.). Diterbitkan oleh: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia ©2018. www.komisiyudisial.go.id

Siregar, M., Syekh, U., Hasan, A., & Padangsidimpuan, A. A. (2023). Kekuasan Kehakiman. 2(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.58819/jurnalfaktahukum(jfh).v2i2.91

Ulya, Z. (2021). DILEMATISASI REGULASI KELEMBAGAAN ANTAR LEMBAGA KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DITINJAU MENURUT KONSEP CHECK AND BALANCES. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 10(3), 337. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.3.2021.337-360

Wicaksono, A. T., Nur, A. A., Mar’ah, S., & Huroiroh, E. (2023). Praktik Inkonstitusional Pemberhentian Hakim Konstitusi pada Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Verfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.30762/vjhtn.v2i1.217

Downloads

Published

2025-03-27

How to Cite

Sulis Fauziah. (2025). Reformasi Kelembagaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menjaga Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Mahkamah : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v2i2.542

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.