Penerapan Pemberatan Pidana terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan dalam Rekrutmen Aparatur Sipil Negara

Studi Putusan Nomor 1175/Pid.B/2024/PN Mks

Authors

  • M Rayhan Ramadhan Universitas Indonesia Timur Makassar
  • Ambo Esa Universitas Indonesia Timur Makassar
  • Asrul Aswar Universitas Indonesia Timur Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v2i4.1328

Keywords:

ASN, Civil Servants, Fraud, Judicial Reasoning, Recidivism

Abstract

This study analyzes the application of sentence enhancement to perpetrators of fraud in the recruitment of civil servants (ASN) and examines the consistency of judicial reasoning in Decision No. 1175/Pid.B/2024/PN Mks. The research focuses on two main issues: the fulfillment of the requirements for sentence enhancement under Articles 52 and 486–488 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), and the alignment of the judge’s considerations with the principles of criminal sentencing. Using a normative juridical method and employing statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, this research finds that the application of Article 378 KUHP was appropriate, as the elements of deception were proven. However, sentence enhancement under Articles 52 and 486–488 KUHP was not applied due to the absence of a functional connection between the perpetrator’s status as an ASN and the offense, as well as the failure to meet the formal requirements of recidivism. Although the decision is legally defensible in a formal sense, it lacks substantive completeness in addressing moral and sociological considerations. The perpetrator’s ASN status and prior conviction should reasonably serve as aggravating factors. The study concludes that while the decision is normatively consistent, it falls short of achieving substantive justice, particularly regarding public protection and the integrity of the civil service.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barama, M. (2015). Tindak Pidana Khusus (1st ed.). Manado. Unsrat Press.

Chandra, T. Y. (2022). Hukum Pidana (Putera Yasmono, Ed.). Jakarta. PT. Sangir Multi Usaha.

Chaterine, R. N. (2022). Ramai kasus penipuan CPNS, sudah 359 peserta didiskualifikasi selama seleksi 2021. Kompas.com.

Florence Parengkuan, E., Djaja Sidarta, D., Syahrul Borman, M., & Handayati, N. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penindakan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Di Wilayah Hukum Kepolisian Daerah Sulawesi Utara. COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 5(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.69957/cr.v5i01.1726

Hadiyanto, A., Prasetyo, M. S. E., Sumarwoto, Royani, E., Saragih, Y. M., Sulistyowati, H., & Budiman, H. (2023). Tindak Pidana Penipuan Menurut KUHP dan Syariat Islam (T. Artanto, Ed.; 1st ed.). Damera Press.

Kamaruddin, I. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Dasar (1st ed.). Makassar, YAYASAN BARCODE.

Kusomo, A. G., Wandira, Y. M. A., & Mangiri, M. (2020). Kasus Penipuan Calon ASN karena Kelalaian Kantor Regional I BKN. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia, 94-111.

Lase, Y., & Ndraha, A. B. (2023). Analisis Urgensi Pelatihan Dalam Pengembangan Kompetensi Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) Di Pengadilan Negeri Gunungsitoli. JURNAL ILMIAH MANAJEMEN BISNIS DAN INOVASI UNIVERSITAS SAM RATULANGI (JMBI UNSRAT), 10(3), 1804-1814. https://doi.org/10.35794/jmbi.v10i3.52456

Mukhlis, Tarmizi, & Hadi, A. (2018). Hukum Pidana. Banda Aceh. Syiah Kuala University Press.

Nusa, A., & Darmawati. (2022). Pokok Pokok Hukum Pidana (1st ed.). Setara Press.

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Kode Etik Aparatur Sipil Negara Di Lingkungan Kementerian Dalam Negeri.

Saragih, Y. M., Hadiyanto, A., & Prasetyo, M. S. E. (2022). Pengantar Hukum Pidana: Transisi Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia (A. F. Rahma, Ed.). Medan. CV. Tungga Esti.

Sarnawa, B., & Sukiyoprapti, H. (2017). Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil (Satu Pengantar) (Soeprijadi, Ed.). Sleman. Citra Prima Persada.

Sinurat, A. (2023). Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana Materil Di Indonesia. Kupang. Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Nusa Cendana.

Sriwidodo, J. (2019). Kajian Hukum Pidana Indonesia (1st ed.). Jakarta. Penerbit Kepel Press.

Suyanto, H. (2018). Pengantar Hukum Pidana (P. K. Anggraini, Ed.; 1st ed.). Sleman. CV Budi Utama.

Syarimah, N., & Rima Melati, S. (2024). Pemisahan Berkas Perkara Pidana (Splitsing) dalam Penunjukan Majelis Hakim dan Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Banding di Pengadilan Tinggi Surabaya. Jurnal Global Ilmiah, 2(2). https://arl.ridwaninstitute.co.id/index.php/arl https://doi.org/10.55324/jgi.v2i2.139

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 Tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

M Rayhan Ramadhan, Ambo Esa, & Asrul Aswar. (2025). Penerapan Pemberatan Pidana terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan dalam Rekrutmen Aparatur Sipil Negara: Studi Putusan Nomor 1175/Pid.B/2024/PN Mks. Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 2(4), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v2i4.1328

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.