Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dalam Mediasi Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan

Authors

  • Muhammad Kaffi Al Mubaarok Kaffi Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta
  • Sahril Fadli Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v2i3.945

Keywords:

Financial Services Authority, Mediation, Financial Services Disputes, Legal Effectiveness

Abstract

The complexity of the financial services sector necessitates effective dispute resolution mechanisms. This study analyzes the implementation of financial services dispute mediation by OJK DIY under OJK Regulation No. 1/LAPS-SJK/I/2021 and explores procedural constraints. An empirical juridical method with qualitative approach was employed through in-depth interviews with OJK DIY officials and consumers utilizing mediation services, supplemented by secondary data from official documents and related regulations analyzed descriptively. Findings reveal a low mediation success rate of 18.67% from 2,501 complaints in 2023 with an average resolution duration of 10 working days. Primary obstacles include digital gaps in service access, insufficient legal and financial literacy among the public, bargaining power disparities between consumers and financial institutions, and limited program socialization. The research recommends transforming OJK DIY's mediation system through enhanced digital access, strengthened consumer education, equalized bargaining positions, and intensified socialization. This study contributes to developing more efficient and equitable dispute resolution policies and provides strategic recommendations for improving consumer protection in Indonesia's financial services sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akram, H., & St, A. (2023). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pemberian Ijin Belajar Bagi Pegawai Negeri Sipil Di Lingkungan Pemerintah Provinsi Riau. Universitas Islam Riau.

Bentham, J. (1945). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation..pdf (C. W. Everett (ed.)).

Bush, R. A. B., & Folger, J. P. (2005). The Promise Of Mediation : The Transformative Approach To Conflict (2nd ed.). Jossey Bass.

Fuad, Z., Harahap, M. Y., & Junisa, E. (2022). The Effectiveness of KHI in the Effort to Minimize Case of Divorce; Case Study at the Sigli Shar’i Court. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 33(1), 139–152.

Gunadi, A., Aprilia, I. S., & Johan, S. (2023). Implikasi Peundang-Undangan No. 4 Tahun 2023 Terkait Dengan Industri Keuangan. Politik Hukum, 4.

Gusdarnelis, D., Iyah Faniyah, & Bisma Putra Pratama. (2024). Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Penolakan Klaim Asuransi Kerugian oleh Perusahaan Asuransi Terhadap Nasabahnya. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(4), 1321–1331.

Hasanah, N., Sayuti, M. N., & Lisnawati. (2024). Optimalisasi Regulasi Perbankan Syariah Oleh Bank Indonesia Dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Akselerasi Transformasi Digital. Manajemen Terapan Dan Keuangan, 13(03), 709–723.

Heriyadi, H. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Peran Dan Fungsi Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Ojk) Dalam Sistem Keuangan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 11(1), 36–44.

Kithandi, C. K. (2025). Theory Of Financial Intermediation : A Millenial Perspectife Of Theory. Journal International IJRRCEM, 12(1), 1–12.

Noorsanti, I. A., & Yudhanti, R. (2023). Kemanfaatan Hukum Jeremy Bentham Relevansinya dengan Kebijakan Pemerintah melalui Bantuan Langsung Tunai Dana Desa. Sultan Jurisprudence : Jurnal Riset Imu Hukum, 3(2), 183–193.

PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 (Tentang Prosedur Mediasi), 53 Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 1689 (2016).

Posner, R. A. (1981). The Economics of Justice. Harvard University Press. In Harvard University Press (Vol. 11, Issue 1).

Safly, A. M., & Musataklima. (2024). Dualisme Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Jasa Keuangan dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kepastian Hukum Sengketa Jasa Keuangan. Jurnal Islamic Business Law, 8(3), 69–86.

Salsabilla, H. (2025). Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Disiplin, 1(1), 15–23.

SAMOSIR, A. (2023) Kewenangan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Ojk) Dalam Pengawasan Untuk Meningkatkan Kebijakan Perbankan Berbasis Nilai Keadilan.

Soekanto, S. (2019). Pokok - Pokok Sosiologi Hukum (26th ed.). PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Sugianto, F. A., & Marpaung, D. S. H. (2022). Efektivitas Peranan Mediasi Dalam Upaya Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Kekayaan Intelektual. Jurnal Meta-Yuridis, 5(1), 51–59.

Syafitri, Y. (2023). Implikasi Penerbitan Omnibus Law Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan ( UU P2SK ) Terhadap Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan ( OJK ) dalam Sektor Keuangan. Unes Law Review, 6(1), 860–867.

Ulinihayati, N., & Husein, Y. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perasuransian Melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(4), 350.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-04

How to Cite

Kaffi, M. K. A. M., & Sahril Fadli. (2025). Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dalam Mediasi Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v2i3.945

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.