Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Kasus Penadahan Melalui Facebook Marketplace di Kejaksaan Negeri Buleleng
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v2i2.922Keywords:
Attorney General Regulation No. 15 of 2020, Facebook Marketplace, Public Prosecutor's Office of Buleleng, receiving stolen property, Restorative JusticeAbstract
This research aims (1) examine the implementation of restorative justice by the Buleleng District Prosecutor's Office in cases of receiving stolen goods (penadahan) committed through the Facebook Marketplace platform, with a primary focus on the application of restorative justice despite the loss value exceeding the threshold set by prevailing laws and regulations; and (2) identify the considerations used by the Buleleng District Prosecutor’s Office in applying restorative justice to cases of receiving stolen goods conducted via Facebook Marketplace. The research adopts an empirical juridical method with a descriptive approach. Participants were selected purposively using purposive sampling. Data collection techniques included direct observation, interviews with relevant parties, and a review of legal documents, which were then analyzed qualitatively.The findings indicate that (1) resolution through Restorative Justice remains possible even if the loss exceeds IDR 2,500,000, as long as all substantive requirements stipulated in Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 are fulfilled. The decision to terminate prosecution in this case was based on considerations of justice for the victim and the fact that the perpetrator’s level of culpability was not considered severe; and(2) the victim did not object to the act of receiving stolen goods and prioritized the return of their motorcycle, which was successfully recovered in its original condition. The victim also supported the peace process and did not file charges against the alleged receiver.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, H. K. (2017). Berbagai metodologi dalam penelitian pendidikan dan manajemen. Gunadarma Ilmu.
APJII. (2024). Jumlah pengguna internet Indonesia tembus 221 juta orang. Diakses dari https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang
Mauludin, S., Teza, Sulistiani, L., & Ramdan, A. (2024). Penyimpangan terhadap Pasal 5 ayat (1) huruf b dan c Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan keadilan restoratif terhadap perkara yang memiliki kriteria/keadaan yang bersifat kasuistik. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(7). Diakses pada 16 April 2025 dari https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/463
Sukardi. (2020). Restorative justice dalam penegakan hukum pidana Indonesia. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Rajamuddin, A. (2014).Tinjauan kriminologi terhadap timbulnya kejahatan yang diakibatkan oleh pengaruh minuman keras di Kota Makassar. Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan, 3(2), 181–192. https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/463
Soekanto, S. (2006). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sahputra, M. (2022). Restorative justice sebagai wujud hukum progresif dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 12(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.56196/jta.v12i01.205
Sarbini, I., Sukirman, & Ma'arij, A. (2020). Restorative justice sebagai alternatif penyelesaian perkara pidana. Jurnal Fundamental.
Yasin, M. (2018). Peradilan yang sederhana, cepat, dan biaya ringan. Hukumonline. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/peradilan-yang-sederhana--cepat--dan-biaya-ringan-lt5a7682eb7e074/
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
Peraturan Kejaksaan No. 15 Tahun 2020
Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kerjaksaan Republik Indonesia
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



