Unsur Menyalahgunakan Wewenang dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Authors

  • Revata Vappa Lazuardi Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Luthfie Arya Deanova Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/referendum.v1i3.159

Keywords:

Annotation, Corruption, PDAM

Abstract

The defendant Haris Yasin Limpo, who is the Main Director of the Regional Drinking Water Company (PDAM) of Makassar City, together with Irawan Abadi, committed the crime of corruption by distributing bonuses and company bonuses/services based on Ujung Pandang Level II Regional Regulation Number 6 of 1974 from 2017-2019 should be based on Government Regulation Number 54 of 2017 concerning Regional-Owned Enterprises, the Defendant also paid dual-purpose insurance premiums for the positions of Mayor and Deputy Mayor of Makassar in 2016-2018 even though it is in the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 2 of 2007 concerning Organs and Regional Drinking Water Company personnel who must be included are only Directors and Employees. The imposition of Article 3 of the Corruption Law on the defendant is inappropriate as per Corruption Court Decision Number 59/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2023/PN Mks because the defendant does not fulfill the elements of abusing authority. The panel of judges should apply Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Corruption Law because its elements are more appropriate to the actions committed by the Defendant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armono, Y. (2014, December). Korupsi karena penyalahgunaan wewenang. Seminar Korupsi 2014. Surakarta: Universitas Surakarta.

Brytting, T., Minogue, R., & Morino, V. (2011). The anatomy of fraud and corruption: Organizational causes and remedies. Gower Publishing.

Cotterel, R. (1989). The politics of jurisprudence: A critical introduction to legal philosophy. Butterworths.

Divisi Hukum dan Monitoring Peradilan Indonesian Corruption Watch. (2024, May). Laporan hasil pemantauan tren korupsi tahun 2023. Diakses pada tanggal 23 September 2024, dari https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/Materi%20Pemaparan%20Laporan%20Pemantauan%20Tren%20Korupsi%20Tahun%202023%20.pdf

Efendi, A. (2019). Interpretasi modern makna menyalahgunakan wewenang dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, 3(12), 327–344.

Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2008). OECD glossaries: Corruption – A glossary of international standards in criminal law. OECD Publishing.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 54 Tahun 2017 tentang Badan Usaha Milik Daerah.

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 2 Tahun 2007 tentang Organ dan Kepegawaian Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum.

Peraturan Daerah Tingkat II Ujung Pandang Nomor 6 Tahun 1974.

Putusan Nomor 59/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2023/PN Mks.

Pramesti, T. J. A. (2015, March 12). Arti menyalahgunakan wewenang dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Diakses pada tanggal 23 September 2024, dari https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/arti-menyalahgunakan-wewenang-dalam-tindak-pidana-korupsi-lt54fbbf142fc22

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Nomor 7 Tahun 2012 tentang Rumusan Hukum Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan.

Transparency International Indonesia. (2024, January 3). Peluncuran hasil indeks persepsi korupsi 2023: Korupsi, demokrasi, dan keadilan. Diakses pada tanggal 23 September 2024, dari https://ti.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/20240130-Presentasi-CPI-2023-1.pdf

United Nations Convention Against Corruption. (2004).

Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006 tentang Pengesahan United Nations Convention Against Corruption.

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Published

2024-09-26

How to Cite

Revata Vappa Lazuardi, & Luthfie Arya Deanova. (2024). Unsur Menyalahgunakan Wewenang dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi . Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata Dan Pidana, 1(3), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.62383/referendum.v1i3.159