Kajian Komprehensif terhadap Persamaan dan Perbedaan Ketentuan Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam KUHP Lama 1946 dan KUHP Baru 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/referendum.v2i2.698Keywords:
1946 Criminal Code, 2023 Criminal Code, Background, Comparative, EmbezzlementAbstract
The development of society and the increasing complexity of legal relations necessitate the reform of the national criminal law system. This research is motivated by the need to examine the relevance and responsiveness of provisions governing the criminal act of embezzlement in the 1946 Indonesian Criminal Code (Old KUHP) and the 2023 Indonesian Criminal Code (New KUHP). The aim of this study is to analyze the substantive similarities and differences between the two codifications of criminal law, and to assess the extent to which the New KUHP addresses the challenges of modern legal systems. This study employs a normative juridical method using a comparative approach to relevant legislation. The findings reveal that, while both codes share fundamental elements of embezzlement and similar sentencing structures, the 2023 KUHP adopts a more progressive approach. Key reforms include the expansion of legal subjects to include corporations, the adjustment of value thresholds for minor embezzlement, the implementation of more flexible sanctions such as fines, and the strengthening of restorative justice principles. The implications of these findings indicate that the 2023 KUHP is more adaptive to socio-economic dynamics and the needs of a modern criminal justice system. Accordingly, the New KUHP offers a more relevant and contextual legal framework, particularly in addressing embezzlement offenses.
Downloads
References
Arief, B. N. (2008). Mediasi penal: Penyelesaian perkara di luar pengadilan. Semarang: Pustaka Magister.
Beccaria, C. (2002). Tentang kejahatan dan hukuman (Terj.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. (Karya asli diterbitkan tahun 1764)
Hamzah, A. (2008). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Hatrik, H. (1996). Asas pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam hukum pidana Indonesia (strict liability dan vicarious liability). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (2010). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Mulyadi, L. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Priyatno, D. (2004). Kebijakan legislasi tentang sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi di Indonesia. Bandung: CV Utomo.
Sanjaya, B., Muladi, M., & Sari, R. K. (2020). Inkonsistensi pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di luar KUHP. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 15(2), 123–138.
Santoso, T., & Zulfa, E. A. (2023). Kriminalisasi dan penal policy dalam hukum pidana baru Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Setiyono, H. (2009). Kejahatan korporasi: Analisis viktimologi dan pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam hukum pidana Indonesia. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2010). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2010). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Yunara, E. (2005). Korupsi dan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.