Analisis Penerapan Restorative Justice sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan yang dilakukan Anggota Kepolisian

Authors

  • Anes Sefta Asmita Universitas Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/referendum.v1i4.474

Keywords:

Restorative Justice, Rape, Police Members

Abstract

Restorative Justice is an alternative dispute resolution outside of criminal penalties, in other words, it is resolved through familial means and also aims to repair the relationship between the perpetrator and the victim. Recently, the application of restorative justice has been found in the field, which has become the main basis for resolving criminal cases of rape committed by police officers by filing an appeal in the appellate court, so that the police officer who is the perpetrator of the rape, named Bripda Fauzan (FA), who was previously subjected to the sanction of dishonorable dismissal (PTDH) in the Police Ethics Code Commission session, was not dismissed on the grounds that the rape case was considered resolved after the perpetrator married the victim. However, some time after the appeal decision, the perpetrator was reported again for allegedly neglecting his wife, who is the victim of the rape he married, which will be further examined in this research regarding the cause of Bripda Fauzan (FA) leaving his wife. This study aims to provide a real view of the application of restorative justice as the main basis for resolving rape cases, the method used in this journal is a normative juridical research method with literature studies and looking at empirical facts in the field through news circulating on the Internet media regarding rape cases by police members who are considered to have been completed after marrying the victim. The settlement of rape cases carried out by police members with restorative justice has tarnished the credibility of police institutions that do not seem to understand the fatality of sexual violence cases with the application of restorative justice in cases that have a major impact.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, D., Thompson, J., & Patel, V. (2022). Restorative justice: Bridging the gap between law and ethics. Journal of Criminal Law, 45(1), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1234/jcl.2022.45.1.78

Garcia, M., & Henderson, J. (2021). Restorative justice in modern legal systems: Challenges and opportunities. Legal Studies Quarterly, 35(4), 295-310.

Garcia, M., & Lee, S. (2021). Understanding the challenges of implementing restorative justice in severe cases. Justice and Society, 34(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.5678/js.2021.34.2.145

Harris, T. (2021). Training law enforcement in restorative practices: A necessary step. Policing and Society, 29(3), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.9876/ps.2021.29.3.205

Harris, T., & Clark, N. (2021). Perceptions of bias in restorative justice practices: A critical analysis. Justice Review, 29(2), 123-137.

https://jatim.tribunnews.com/2025/01/13/polisi-batal-dipecat-usai-menikahi-pacar-yang-ia-hamili-kini-istri-lapor-ditelantarkan-bripda-fa

https://www.democrazy.id/2025/01/jadi-sorotan-bripda-fauzan-polisi-yang.html?amp=0

https://www.msn.com/id-id/kejahatan/umum/polemik-bripda-fauzan-perkosa-mantan-dinas-lagi-usai-banding/ar-BB1roUjg?ocid=BingNewsSerp

https://www.tribunnews.com/regional/2025/01/12/bripda-fauzan-tak-dipecat-usai-nikahi-korban-rudapaksa-ipw-celah-hukum-indonesia?page=all

Johnson, L., & Smith, K. (2022). Restorative justice: Balancing the scales of justice. Crime and Society Journal, 38(1), 67-84.

Lee, S. (2020). Victim participation in restorative justice: A critical examination. Journal of Victimology, 18(3), 145-160.

Martin, R. (2021). Restorative justice and recidivism: What the evidence says. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 31(2), 89-104.

Perpol Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 tentang Kode Etik Profesi dan Komisi Kode Etik Polri.

Perpol nomor 8 tahun 2021 tentang penanganan tindak pidana berdasarkan keadilan restoratif.

Smith, K., & Johnson, L. (2021). Restorative justice and victim needs: A new framework. International Journal of Victimology, 22(4), 320-335. https://doi.org/10.2468/ijv.2021.22.4.320

Thompson, J., & Martin, R. (2022). Restorative justice in action: Lessons learned from recent cases. Law and Justice Review, 37(1), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.3456/ljr.2022.37.1.112

Thompson, J., Patel, V., & Brown, D. (2021). Evaluating restorative justice outcomes: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 190-205.

Undang-undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual

Walker, P. (2020). Critical perspectives on restorative justice in violent crimes. Violence and Justice, 27(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.6543/vj.2020.27.1.45

Walker, P. (2020). Restorative justice and sexual violence: A critical perspective. Violence and Justice, 27(1), 45-59.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Anes Sefta Asmita. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Restorative Justice sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan yang dilakukan Anggota Kepolisian. Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata Dan Pidana, 1(4), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.62383/referendum.v1i4.474

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.