Urgensi Revisi UU TPKS: Hilangkan Subjektivitas Laki-Laki Sebagai Pelaku Dan Perempuan Sebagai Korban (Studi Kebijakan Publik Dan Psikologis Gender)

Edward Benedictus Roring; Indira Jazmine; Selma Dwi Anaya Pebriyanti; Eleonora Gracia Puspa Setiawan; FX Adji Samekto

doi:10.62383/pk.v2i3.1029

Authors

Edward Benedictus Roring Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Indira Jazmine Universitas Diponegoro
Selma Dwi Anaya Pebriyanti Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Eleonora Gracia Puspa Setiawan Universitas Tarumanagara
FX Adji Samekto Universitas Diponegoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/pk.v2i3.1029

Keywords:

Gender Bias, Human Rights, Inclusion, Substantive Justice

Abstract

Revision of the Law on Sexual Violence (UU TPKS) has become a strategic urgency in efforts to eliminate gender bias inherent in the current legal construction, especially related to the subjectivity of men as perpetrators and the objectivity of women as victims. The current TPKS Law, although it has provided an important legal basis for the protection of victims of sexual violence, still contains a gender paradigm that limits the understanding that perpetrators of sexual violence are only men and victims are only women, thus ignoring the complexity of social reality and the diversity of victims and perpetrators23. This approach not only reinforces patriarchal stereotypes, but also hinders fair and inclusive law enforcement. Therefore, the revision of the TPKS Law must be directed at eliminating rigid gender constructions, adopting a more neutral and inclusive perspective, and strengthening responsive legal protection for all victims without exception. This revision must also emphasize the role of the state in fulfilling victims' rights and integrating independent monitoring mechanisms to ensure effective and equitable implementation. Thus, the revision of the TPKS Law is not merely a normative update, but rather a transformation of the legal paradigm that prioritizes gender equality, respect for human rights, and substantive justice for the entire community

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfanada, E. (2023). Urgensi Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Mataram, 2–4.

Badan Legislasi Dpr Ri. (2021). Naskah Akademik Ruu Tpks (Pp. 11–13).

Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender Schema Theory: A Cognitive Account Of Sex Typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. Https://Doi.Org/10.1037/0033-295x.88.4.354

Berliantha, & Fasya, I. A. N. (2023). Perempuan Dalam Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia (Kajian Feminist Legal Theory). Iblam Law Review, 3(2), 15.

Dp3ap2kb Surakarta. (2025). Kenali Hak-Hak Perempuan Dalam Uu Tpks!

Fadhli, Y. Z. (2014). Kedudukan Kelompok Minoritas Dalam Perspektif Ham Dan Perlindungan Hukumnya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(2), 357.

Fitriana, I. (2021). Perlindungan Terhadap Hak-Hak Kelompok Minoritas Di Indonesia Dalam Mewujudkan Equality Before The Law. Al Yasini: Jurnal Keislaman, Sosial, Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 6(2), 232.

Ijrs. (2024). Materi Ajar Uu Tpks (Pp. 4–7).

Kholis, N. (2018). Asas Non Diskriminasi Dalam Contempt Of Court. Jurnal Legality, 26(2), 224.

Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. (2024, Agustus 8). Kesetaraan Gender Penting Dalam Penegakan Hukum Dan Peradilan. Komisi Yudisial. Diakses 23 Juni 2025, Dari Https://Komisiyudisial.Go.Id/Frontend/News_Detail/15695/Kesetaraan-Gender-Penting-Dalam-Penegakan-Hukum-Dan-Peradilan

Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (2002). World Report On Violence And Health. World Health Organization.

Kusuma, A. R. B., Dkk. (2023). Reformasi Hukum Indonesia Melalui Lensa Feminist Legal Theory. Jurnal Yustitia.

Lbh Jakarta. (2022). 10 Catatan Penting Terhadap Uu Tpks. Hukumonline.

Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Jakarta. (2022, April 13). Uu Tpks Sah, Lbh Jakarta Memberi Apresiasi Sekaligus Catatan Penting Kepada Dpr Ri. Https://Bantuanhukum.Or.Id

Lubis, F., Ayuni, N. P., Indah, D. V., Purba, N. Z., Ibadurrahman, T., & Maliha, Z. (2025). Kajian Asas-Asas Equality Before The Law Dalam Praktik Peradilan Perdata. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(3), 7.

Mahkamah News. (2024, April 21). Feminist Legal Theory Dan Penerapan Hukum Di Indonesia. Diakses 23 Juni 2025, Dari Https://Mahkamahnews.Org/2024/04/21/Feminist-Legal-Theory-Dan-Penerapan-Hukum-Di-Indonesia/

Meterko, V., & Cooper, G. (2022). Cognitive Biases In Criminal Case Evaluation: A Review Of The Research. Journal Of Police And Criminal Psychology, 37, 101–122. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11896-020-09425-8

Panerati, S., Rubini, M., Giannella, V. A., Menegatti, M., & Moscatelli, S. (2023). A Multidimensional Implicit Approach To Gender Stereotypes. Frontiers In Psychology, 14, 1280207. Https://Doi.Org/10.3389/Fpsyg.2023.1280207

Poirson, L., Robin, M., Shadili, G., Lamothe, J., Corruble, E., Gressier, F., & Essadek, A. (2023). Male Victims Of Sexual Abuse: Impact And Resilience Processes, A Qualitative Study. Healthcare, 11(13), 1868. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Healthcare11131868

Samekto, F. X. A. S. (2022). Struktur Pemahaman Kajian (Ilmu) Hukum Legal Positivisme. Universitas Diponegoro.

Triantono. (2023). Feminist Legal Theory Dalam Kerangka Hukum Indonesia. Progressive Law And Society.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual, Pasal 24.

Walukow, J. M. (2013). Perwujudan Prinsip Equality Before The Law Bagi Narapidana Di Dalam Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia. Lex Et Societatis, 1(1), 164.

Zaidan, M. A. (2014). Perempuan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Yuridis, 1(2), 231.