Kajian Teoritis tentang Hukuman Pemiskinan bagi Pelaku Korupsi

Authors

  • Dewi Amalia Universitas Bandar Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v1i4.259

Keywords:

Corruption, Student opinion, impoverishment sanctions, asset restitution

Abstract

This article discusses a theoretical study of impoverishment punishment for corrupt perpetrators. Corruption is considered a planned crime that has a negative impact on the state and society and requires decisive action to eradicate it. This survey revealed that the majority of students think that impoverishment punishment, which is expected to have a deterrent effect compared to prison sentences, can be an effective preventive effort in eradicating corruption. The students also emphasized the importance of returning assets to the state to compensate for losses due to corruption. The view of the death penalty for corruption perpetrators is now considered irrelevant, because the focus is on recovery economy and justice. This study shows that a stricter and more systematic approach is needed in eradicating corruption, including stricter regulations, proper asset management, and educating the public about the negative impacts of corruption. Thus, this article presents an understanding of sharing perspectives. The younger generation can help create more effective anti-corruption policies in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aji, Y. B. (2013). Pemiskinan koruptor sebagai hukuman alternatif dalam penegakan hukum kasus korupsi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Criminology, 9(1), 109-240.

Hanyfah, Z., Oktapia, A., & Tirta, M. (2024). Analisi penghitungan kerugian negara dari hasil dugaan tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh PT TIMAH (Tbk). Journal of Law and Nation, 3(2).

Hartono, M. (2022). Sikap mahasiswa hukum terhadap reformasi sanksi korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Hukum, 7(2), 88-105.

Nugroho, R. (2024). Dilema etis penerapan hukuman pemiskinan bagi koruptor: Perspektif hak asasi manusia. Jurnal Etika dan Hukum, 19(1), 55-72.

Prasetyo, Y., & Sari, R. (2024). Evaluasi implementasi kebijakan pemiskinan koruptor: Studi kasus di tiga provinsi. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 13(1), 145-163.

Priscyllia, M. Y. (2014). Pemiskinan koruptor sebagai salah satu hukuman alternatif dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 1-13.

Saputra, A. (2023). Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap hukuman pemiskinan koruptor: Studi kasus di Universitas Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 15(2), 123-145.

Widodo, S., & Pratiwi, L. (2022). Analisis efektivitas sanksi pemiskinan dalam pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 8(3), 78-96.

Zainudin Hasan, et al. (2024). Urgensi pendidikan anti korupsi dalam membangun karakter anak bangsa. Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology, 1(2), 308-315.

Zainudin Hasan, Hartono, B., & Khurniawan, H. B. (2022). Tinjauan kriminologi terhadap tindak pidana korupsi penggelembungan anggaran rehabilitasi gedung SMPN 10 Metro yang dilakukan oleh aparatur sipil negara. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13.

Zainudin Hasan, Hartono, B., Syahira, W. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana korupsi dana tunjangan kinerja Kejaksaan Negeri Bandar Lampung. Perahu (Penerangan Hukum): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(1), 4-19.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

Dewi Amalia. (2024). Kajian Teoritis tentang Hukuman Pemiskinan bagi Pelaku Korupsi. Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 1(4), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v1i4.259