Pendekatan Restorative Justice oleh Kejaksaan dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Penganiayaan Anak di Rumah Restorative Justice

Femi Zulfa Nurkheliza; Heni Siswanto; Dona Raisa Monica

doi:10.62383/presidensial.v2i4.1431

Authors

Femi Zulfa Nurkheliza Universitas Lampung
Heni Siswanto Universitas Lampung
Dona Raisa Monica Universitas Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v2i4.1431

Keywords:

Children, Justice, Persecution, Prosecutor's Office, Restorative

Abstract

The Attorney General's Office plays a strategic role as a neutral facilitator that initiates, leads, and oversees the peace process, from peace offers and mediation to the issuance of a suspension of prosecution based on Attorney General Regulation No. 15 of 2020, while still considering the best interests of children, the restoration of social relations, and the legal benefits for all parties. This approach is considered effective in minimizing the traumatic impact of formal judicial proceedings on children while encouraging the social reintegration of perpetrators. However, the implementation of restorative justice still faces internal obstacles, such as limited operational regulations, the understanding and capacity of law enforcement officials, and suboptimal infrastructure. On the other hand, external obstacles arise from low public awareness of the law, a tendency to demand severe punishment, and a culture that emphasizes pride, which hinders the acceptance of peaceful resolutions. This study emphasizes the importance of strengthening regulations, improving the competence of officials, optimizing the function of Restorative Justice Houses, and intensifying public awareness so that the application of restorative justice in cases of child abuse is not only a procedural alternative but truly functions as a fair and sustainable recovery mechanism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alamsyah, R. F., Alhadi, A. V. R., & Santika, N. N. (2024). Implementasi Rumah Restorative Justice di Kejaksaan Negeri Purbalingga. Soedirman Law Review, 6(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.slr.2024.6.1.16054

Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Arief, H., & Ambarsari, N. (2018). Penerapan prinsip restorative justice dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v10i2.1362

Baety, A. N., Rahmawati, A. V., Kusuma, D. A., & Farhan, A. (2025). Pendampingan hukum terhadap anak di bawah umur sebagai korban penganiayaan dalam upaya restorative justice. Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Akademik, 2(2), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v2i2.4326

Baharuddin, R. P., & Hanafi, M. A. (2024). Penerapan restorative justice terhadap anak sebagai korban kejahatan pada Pengadilan Negeri Makassar. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 6(2), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v6i2.4528

Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi penelitian hukum sebagai instrumen mengurai permasalahan hukum kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504

Bulqis, A. A. R., Ahmad, K., & Mamonto, M. A. W. W. (2025). Peran penuntut umum pada pendekatan restorative justice kasus tindak pidana penganiayaan. Legal Dialogica, 1(1), 1–12.

Flora, H. S. (2017). Pendekatan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia.

Ishak, M., Rahman, S., & Razak, A. (2023). Efektivitas penerapan keadilan restoratif dalam penegakan hukum pidana di Kepolisian Resort Kota Mamuju. Journal of Lex Philosophy, 4(2), 377–389.

Kurniawan, D., Siswanto, H., & Chairani, D. (2022). Principle of prosecutors’ independency in deponering criminal cases for public interest in Indonesia. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 5(4), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2022.v05i04.002

Manthovani, R. (2024). Tantangan mengharmonisasi restorative justice dalam ius constituendum antar penegak hukum. Hukum Online.

Maulana, I., & Agusta, M. (2021). Konsep dan implementasi restorative justice di Indonesia. Datin Law Journal, 2(11), 46–70.

Mohd. Yusuf Dm., Putra, A. K., Hasibuan, R. Y., & Giawa, S. D. (2025). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum dalam masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(4), 2866–2871. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i4.4234

Nofarizal, D., Yusuf, Y., & Pardede, R. (2024). Penyelesaian hukum keadilan restoratif terhadap pelaku penganiayaan. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 7(2), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v7i2.1350

Nur, F. (2025). Hambatan penerapan restorative justice pada penyelesaian tindak pidana kekerasan terhadap anak. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 5(1), 1727–1737.

Puluhulawa, R. U., Kamaru, R. S., & Mantali, A. R. Y. (2023). Pelaksanaan restorative justice terhadap tindak pidana pengeroyokan. Journal of Comprehensive Science, 2(5), 1125–1132. https://doi.org/10.59188/jcs.v2i5.328

Saputra, S. N. E., & Isnawati, M. (2022). Overcrowding lembaga pemasyarakatan (lapas) dalam sistem pemidanaan di Indonesia. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 6(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v0i0.3822

Sunggono, B. (2006). Metodologi penelitian hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Syafitri, H. P., Monica, D. R., Siswanto, H., Fathonah, R., & Meidiantama, R. (2025). Efektivitas diversi sebagai upaya penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana pencurian oleh anak. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 15(11), 51–60.

Taufan, U., Alam, A. S., & Chaidar, M. (2023). Pengaturan restorative justice terhadap pelaku dan korban dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana anak. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Wijaya Putra, 1(2), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.38156/jihwp.v1i2.143

Wibowo, K. T., & Utaminingrum, E. G. Y. (2022). Implementasi keadilan restoratif dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Papas Sinar Sinanti.