Pidana Alternatif Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan Kaitannya dengan Tujuan Pemidanaan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v1i4.197Keywords:
KUHP 2023, Alternative Penalty, Supervision Penalty, Social Work Penalty, Purpose of PunishmentAbstract
The enactment of the 2023 Criminal Code shows a change in the direction of punishment in Indonesia. The 2023 Criminal Code emphasises the purpose of punishment on prevention, correction, and restoration of balance, in contrast to the old Criminal Code which was more oriented towards providing deterrent effects. This is proven by the emergence of alternative punishment in the form of supervision punishment and social work punishment. The purpose of this study is to examine whether this alternative punishment is appropriate when viewed from the purpose of punishment and how the implementation of alternative punishment in other countries. This alternative punishment not only provides a more humane and restorative punishment option, but is also expected to overcome the problem of overcapacity of Correctional Institutions (Lapas). In addition, this research discusses the implementation of alternative punishment in other countries, such as the Netherlands and Portugal, which have proven effective in reducing the prison population and recidivism rate. By using normative juridical research method, the author makes the Criminal Code 2023 as the main legal basis to be analysed.
Downloads
References
Artikel Jurnal
Hidayati, S.N. (2016). Pengaruh Pendekatan Keras dan Lunak Pemimpin Organisasi terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Potensi Mogok Kerja Karyawan. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 57-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.30588/SOSHUMDIK.v5i2.164.
Risdwiyanto, A. & Kurniyati, Y. (2015). Strategi Pemasaran Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Kabupaten Sleman Yogyakarta Berbasis Rangsangan Pemasaran. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.30588/SOSHUMDIK.v5i1.142.
Bator, R. J., Bryan, A. D., & Schultz, P. W. (2011). Who Gives a Hoot?: Intercept Surveys of Litterers and Disposers. Environment and Behavior, 43(3), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509356884.
Mubarok, H. & Yulianti, Y. (2023), Peluang dan Tantangan Era Baru Sistem Pemidanaan Indonesia. Restorative: Journal of Indonesian Probation and Parole System, 1(1).
Imawan dkk. (2024). Mengeksplorasi Pidana Alternatif dalam Bingkai Studi Komparasi. EKOMA: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, 3(3).
Muksin, M. (2023). Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus, 8(1).
Nethan, dkk. (2023). Over Kapasitas pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(2).
Yolanda, dkk. (2022). Analisis Pelaksanaan Pidana Kerja Sosial Berdasarkan RKUHP 2019. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 18(1).
Buku Teks
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. R. (2009). Up and Out of Poverty: The Social Marketing Solution. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Arief, Barda N. (1998). Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Arief, Barda N. (2009). Tujuan dan Pedoman Pemidanaan. Semarang: Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hiariej, Eddy O.S. (2016) Prinsip-prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Muladi & Arief, Barda N. (2005), Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Lamintang, P.A.F. (1984). Hukum Penitensier Indonesia. Bandung: Armico.
Sumber dari internet dengan nama penulis
Widi, Shilvina. (2023). Overkapasitas Lapas RI Capai 89,35% hingga Akhir Maret 2023. DataIndonesia.id. Available at https://dataindonesia.id/varia/detail/overkapasitas-lapas-ri-capai-8935-hingga-akhir-maret-2023
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Allison Dara Dharmawan, Nadira Karisma Ramadanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
