Penerapan Model Kebijakan Kepemilikan Kendaraan sebagai Upaya Mengurangi Kadar Emisi Karbon Dioksida di Indonesia dan Singapura

Authors

  • Miftah Anandini Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Dian Azmi Khadijah Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Febri Dwi Saputri Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Shofiyah Aulia Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Mawar Mawar Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v2i3.959

Keywords:

Carbon Emissions, Indonesia, Singapore, Transportation Regulation, Vehicle Policy

Abstract

The issue of carbon emissions in the transportation sector is a major challenge for developing countries like Indonesia, which experiences a sharp increase in vehicle ownership each year. This study aims to compare vehicle ownership policies between Indonesia and Singapore as strategies for reducing carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions. Using a qualitative method with a comparative study approach, data were obtained through literature analysis on regulations, policies, and secondary emission data. The results indicate that Indonesia focuses more on incentives and emission standards tightening, while Singapore enforces strict vehicle ownership restrictions through the Certificate of Entitlement (COE) system, additional taxes, and vehicle age limitations. The novelty of this study lies in its comparative focus on vehicle ownership regulations as policy instruments for emission control—an aspect rarely examined in the Southeast Asian administrative context. The study concludes that strict and structured regulations, supported by efficient public transport systems, are key to reducing transportation-related carbon emissions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Friedlingstein, P., O’Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Gregor, L., Hauck, J., … Peters, G. P. (2022). Global carbon budget 2022. Earth System Science Data, 14(11), 4811–4900. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022

Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2020). Sociotechnical transitions for deep dekarbonisasi. Science, 367(6481), 1242–1244. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw6760

Gillingham, K., & Stock, J. H. (2021). The cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(4), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.4.87

Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. (2022). Policy capacity and governance: Assessing governmental competences and capabilities in theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77454-8

International Transport Forum. (2021). ITF transport outlook 2021. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/16826a30-en

Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2022). Policy innovation and experimentation: Fostering operational climate policy through learning. Environmental Politics, 31(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1952776

Kusuma, D. A., Santosa, P. W., & Wijaya, A. (2023). The adoption of electric vehicles in Indonesia: Policy incentives and market responses. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(4), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14567

Litman, T. (2022). Transportation and environmental policy: Strategies for reducing vehicle emissions. Journal of Transport & Health, 24, 101339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101339

Ng, K. W., Tan, C. Y., & Lee, T. H. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of vehicle quota systems: A comparative study of Singapore and other global cities. Transport Policy, 106, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.03.007

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2021). OECD environmental performance reviews: Towards sustainable transitions in transport. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5a44c55f-en

Sovacool, B. K., Ryan, S. E., Stern, P. C., Janda, K., Rochlin, G., Spreng, D., … Pasqualetti, M. J. (2020). The clean energy revolution: A comprehensive policy framework. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101774

Sun, Y., Zhang, K. M., & Jin, L. (2023). Strategies for reducing emissions from urban transportation: A policy perspective. Environmental Science & Policy, 146, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.03.012

Tan, Y. L., Goh, K. C., & Sim, C. H. (2021). Managing urban mobility: Lessons from Singapore’s integrated policies on car ownership and road pricing. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(4), 1826–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.09.003

Van den Berg, N. J., Hilaire, J., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2020). How can climate policy be more effective? Integrating policy mixes and governance structures. Climate Policy, 20(3), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1686496

Zhang, L., Wang, X., & Wang, H. (2024). Fiscal instruments to promote low emission vehicles: A review of global practices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 174, 103794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103794

Downloads

Published

2025-07-07

How to Cite

Miftah Anandini, Dian Azmi Khadijah, Febri Dwi Saputri, Shofiyah Aulia, & Mawar Mawar. (2025). Penerapan Model Kebijakan Kepemilikan Kendaraan sebagai Upaya Mengurangi Kadar Emisi Karbon Dioksida di Indonesia dan Singapura. Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(3), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v2i3.959

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.