Tinjauan Yuridis Pembatalan Tindakan Unilateral Debitur Pailit Melalui Gugatan Actio Pauliana Demi Melindungi Hak-Hak Kreditor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/referendum.v3i1.1539Keywords:
Actio Pauliana, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Estate, Creditor Rights, Unilateral ActionAbstract
This research aims to analyze the juridical mechanism and implementation of canceling unilateral actions by bankrupt debtors through the actio pauliana lawsuit, providing legal protection for creditors. Debtors often transfer assets before bankruptcy, reducing the value of the bankruptcy estate and harming creditors. Using a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study explores the legal basis of Article 1341 of the Indonesian Civil Code, as elaborated by Articles 41 to 50 of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (UUKPKPU). The analysis shows that canceling unilateral actions, such as asset transfers, grants, or debt waivers, requires evidence of bad faith and awareness of potential losses by both debtors and third parties. This lawsuit serves as a claw-back provision to retrieve assets that were wrongfully removed from the bankruptcy estate, ensuring the pari passu pro rata parte principle. The main obstacle is proving the subjective element of "knowledge" and the conflict of interest with protecting third parties acting in good faith. In conclusion, strengthening the curator’s role and aligning the interpretation of commercial court judges is crucial to protect creditors' economic rights from manipulative actions by debtors.
Downloads
References
Adhi, Y. P. (2018). Akibat hukum pembatalan hibah melalui Actio Pauliana terhadap harta pailit. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 3(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v3i1.2388
Adriani, D., & Salami, R. U. (2020). Rasio legis tuntutan Actio Pauliana oleh kurator dalam pemberesan harta pailit. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 9(4), 845-858. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i04.p12
Arisaputra, M. I. (2015). Esensi Actio Pauliana sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi kreditor. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 27(3), 472-485. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15881
Asy'ari, H. (2019). Pembuktikan itikad buruk dalam perkara Actio Pauliana pada pengadilan niaga. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 8(2), 245-266. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.8.2.2019.245-266
Atmadja, G. S. (2020). Kedudukan kurator dalam melakukan upaya hukum Actio Pauliana. Jurnal Kertha Patrika, 42(2), 150-165. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthapatrika/article/view/60121
Batubara, F. (2019). Tantangan kurator dalam menyajikan bukti konklusif kolusi debitur-pihak ketiga. Jurnal Litigasi, 20(2), 88-104. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/litigasi/article/view/1920
Budiono, H. (2017). Tinjauan yuridis mengenai Actio Pauliana menurut KUHPerdata dan UU Kepailitan. Jurnal Hukum Projustitia, 35(2), 120-135. http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/projustitia/article/view/2560
Cahyaningtyas, I. (2019). Analisis yuridis pembatalan perbuatan hukum debitur yang merugikan kreditor (Studi Actio Pauliana). Law Reform, 15(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23354
Fitriana, N. (2022). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 436 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021 terhadap rekayasa korporasi. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 10(4), 812-828. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/82341
Ginting, R. (2019). Kedudukan hukum pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik dalam gugatan Actio Pauliana. Jurnal Hukum To-Ra, 5(3), 112-124. http://ejournal.uki.ac.id/index.php/tora/article/view/1560
Hariyanto, S. (2021). Efektivitas gugatan lain-lain dalam mempercepat proses Actio Pauliana di pengadilan niaga. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 15(1), 45-62. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/kebijakan/article/view/1541
Kurniawan, K. (2020). Analisis suspect period dalam pembatalan transaksi oleh kurator. Jurnal Privat Law, 8(2), 245-255. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/privatlaw/article/view/45678
Kusumawardani, D. (2019). Implementasi Actio Pauliana terhadap aset atas nama pasangan dalam perkawinan. Jurnal Hukum Perdata Terapan, 4(2), 90-105. https://journal.ui.ac.id/index.php/jhpt/article/view/2119
Lestari, P. (2021). Standar pembuktian itikad buruk dalam perselisihan penafsiran hakim niaga. Jurnal Yudisial, 14(2), 189-208. https://jurnalyudisial.komisiyudisial.go.id/index.php/jy/article/view/512
Mulyani, T. (2020). Perlindungan kreditor konkuren melalui penarikan kembali aset yang dialihkan secara unilateral. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(3), 310-325. https://ejurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/612
Nugraha, A. (2021). Perlindungan pihak ketiga beritikad baik: Analisis standar pria yang jujur dan cermat. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 33(1), 120-138. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.59124
Pratama, A. Y. (2020). Konstruksi hukum Actio Pauliana terhadap transaksi terafiliasi dalam kepailitan. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p167-186
Saputra, R. (2019). Prinsip separate legal entity vs Actio Pauliana dalam pengalihan utang direksi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(2), 245-266. https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/13102
Sari, K. (2022). Sinkronisasi Pasal 1131 KUHPerdata dengan skema kepemilikan nominal (Nominee Arrangement). Jurnal Hukum Projustitia, 40(2), 155-172. https://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/projustitia/article/view/5678
Sastrawan, I. M. (2019). Pembuktian unsur kerugian kreditor dalam gugatan Actio Pauliana oleh kurator. Acta Comitialis, 2(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2019.v02.i01.p07
Setiawan, R. (2018). Analisis yuridis terhadap Actio Pauliana sebagai perlindungan hukum bagi kreditor dalam perkara kepailitan. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 7(1), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.1.2018.55-74
Shubhan, M. H. (2014). Karakteristik hukum kepailitan dan Actio Pauliana di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia, 32(1), 1-15. http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/projustitia/article/view/1054
Situmorang, J. (2022). Dampak makro asset recovery rate melalui Actio Pauliana terhadap iklim investasi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Hukum Komersial, 3(1), 45-58. https://journal.unair.ac.id/JEHK/article/view/7890
Wibowo, R. A. (2019). Pendekatan analisis ekonomi terhadap hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(2), 345-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2010
Yohanes, O. (2022). Kedudukan harta bersama dalam sita umum kepailitan melalui Actio Pauliana. Jurnal Hukum Unes, 6(2), 200-218. https://doi.org/10.31933/unes.v6i2.789
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
