Non-Fungible Token Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Guna Mengoptimalisasi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/referendum.v1i3.168Keywords:
Intellectual Property Rights, Fiduciary Guarantee, Non-Fungible TokenAbstract
This research examines the problem of technological advances creating digital transformation in various aspects of life, one of which is art. Digital evolution in art, giving rise to various new creative expressions, one of which is Non-Fungible Tokens. NFT as a form of creative output has Copyright which is part of Intellectual Property Rights. Based on Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 concerning Implementing Regulations for Law Number 24 of 2019 concerning the Creative Economy, Intellectual Property Rights can be used as a basis for financing the creative economy sector. This research aims as an effort to encourage the progress of the creative economy sector by examining NFTs as objects of Fiduciary Guarantees in order to optimize Intellectual Property Rights as the basis for financing schemes for the creative economy sector. This research is a prescriptive normative legal research. Types of secondary data include primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is done by literature study, then a conceptual approach is used. The results of this study indicate that NFTs have the potential to be used as objects of fiduciary guarantees, however, there are obstacles in regulations and mechanisms that have not been protected by the government, so it is necessary to adjust more specific regulations related to the use of digital assets in fiduciary schemes and education and increased digital literacy for financial institutions and creative economy actors regarding the potential and risks of using NFTs as objects of fiduciary guarantees.
Downloads
References
Adam Muko. (2024). Kajian smart contract dalam perspektif hukum positif di Indonesia. Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 2(2), 13-24.
Adrian Sutedi. (2013). Hak atas kekayaan intelektual. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Aufar Abdul Aziz. (2022). Pembangunan hukum nasional menghadapi non-fungible tokens dalam revolusi digital. Lex Renaissance, 7(2), 358-371.
Fairfield, J. (2022). Tokenized: The law of non-fungible tokens and unique digital property. Indiana Law Journal, 97, 1261.
Han, J., Song, M., Eom, H., & Son, Y. (2021). An efficient multi-signature wallet in blockchain using bloom filter. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 273-281).
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Muhammad Ahkam Subroto. (2005). Eksplorasi konsep kekayaan intelektual untuk penumbuhan inovasi. Jakarta: LIPI Press.
Muhammad Usman Noor. (2021). NFT (Non-Fungible Token): Masa depan arsip digital? Atau hanya sekedar bubble? Pustakaloka: Jurnal Kajian Informasi dan Perpustakaan, 13(2), 223-234.
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 2022 tentang peraturan pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2019 tentang ekonomi kreatif.
Peraturan Perbappebti No. 5 Tahun 2019 tentang ketentuan teknis penyelenggaraan pasar fisik aset kripto (crypto asset) di bursa berjangka.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2016). Penelitian hukum: Edisi revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
Sabda Dewa, J. A. H., Waspada, I., & Sasongko, P. S. (2024). Hybrid ERC20 Ethereum blockchain multisignature wallet 3of3 with withdrawal pattern, external effects, and mutex as single key and reentrancy mitigation. Jurnal Masyarakat Informatika, 15(1), 14-30.
Soeroso. (2011). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Undang-Undang No. 42 Tahun 1999 tentang jaminan fidusia.
Wood, G., et al. (2014). Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum Project Yellow Paper, 151, 1–32.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.