The Concept of Liability Without Fault in Environmental Dispute Resolution In Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/pk.v2i2.521Keywords:
Dispute, Environment, Liability Without FaultAbstract
This study aims to analyze the application of the concept of liability without fault in resolving environmental disputes in Indonesia, by highlighting the legal basis, implementation, and challenges faced. The method used is a conceptual approach to examine relevant regulations and court decisions in order to obtain legal clarity regarding absolute responsibility in environmental pollution cases. The results of the study indicate that although this principle has been regulated in Article 88 of UUPPLH No. 32 of 2009 and reinforced by various derivative regulations, its implementation still faces obstacles, especially in terms of law enforcement, supervision, and compliance of business actors in carrying out environmental restoration obligations. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations, increase the capacity of law enforcement officers, and implement environmental assurance mechanisms to ensure the effectiveness of liability without fault in environmental protection in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Akib, M., Triono, A., Tisnanta, H. S., Hukum, F., & Medlimo, R. A. (2023). Application of strict liability principles in environmental dispute resolution. Annals of Justice and Humanity, 2(2), 65–75.
Arbani, T. S., Hukum, I., Islam, U., & Alauddin, N. (2022). Asas pertanggungjawaban mutlak (strict liability) atas kerusakan lingkungan pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Al-Ḥaḍārah Al-Islāmiyah, 4(April), 23–37.
Arifin, Z. (2022). Liability without fault dalam penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan hidup di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 2(October), 2018. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v4i2.74
Kochashvili, K. (2023). Liability without fault – an exception to the general rule of private law. International Journal Law and Justice, 2(1), 58–74.
Kusuma, L. A. N. (2022). Environmental disputes without protection of strict liability principles: Again, law on job creation. International Journal Law and Justice, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v7i1.699
Mahardika, A. G. (2022). Implikasi penghapusan strict liability dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja terhadap lingkungan hidup di era Sustainable Development Goals. Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan, 2(1), 58–84.
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Penataan regulasi di Indonesia melalui lembaga independen. Pandecta, 16(2), 278–290.
Nurlaily, N. Y., & Supriyo, A. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam kasus pencemaran lingkungan hidup. Media of Law and Sharia, 3(3), 255–269.
Rokilah. (2020). The role of the regulations in Indonesia state system. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 29–38.
Romsan, H. A., Basyeban, A., & Idris, M. (2019). The use of the strict liability principle by the Indonesian courts in solving environmental conflicts. Atlantis Press, 349(Iccd), 1–3.
Sembiring, T. B., Irmawati, Sabir, M., & Tjahyadi, I. (2023). Buku ajar metodologi penelitian (teori dan praktik). Saba Jaya Publisher.
Siagian, F. S., Saragih, G. M., & Firouzfar, S. (2024). Implementation of straight liability and liability based on fault concepts in environmentally sound economic development in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 1(6), 98–107.
Silalahi, W. (2020). Penataan regulasi berkualitas dalam rangka terjaminnya supremasi hukum. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 8(1), 56–66.
Suud, A. K. (2023). Analisis penerapan konsep pertanggungjawaban mutlak (strict liability) dalam kasus korupsi. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 52(2), 153–162.
Wongkar, E. (2024). Meninjau kembali strict liability: Perkembangan konseptual dan tantangannya dalam ajudikasi lingkungan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pro Natura, 1(1), 1–18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pemuliaan Keadilan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
