Tindakan Represif Aparat Penegak Hukum dalam Aksi Unjuk  Rasa terhadap Kebijakan Pemerintahan Prabowo dalam  Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia

Ninin Armianti Natsir; Santy Isma Handikasari; Nurul Fajriani; Ryan Asprimagama; Surez Taruna Pramata; Insan Tajali Nur

doi:10.62383/federalisme.v2i4.1253

Authors

Ninin Armianti Natsir Universitas Mulawarman
Santy Isma Handikasari Universitas Mulawarman
Nurul Fajriani Universitas Mulawarman
Ryan Asprimagama Universitas Mulawarman
Surez Taruna Pramata Universitas Mulawarman
Insan Tajali Nur Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v2i4.1253

Keywords:

Aspirations, Demonstrations, Human Rights, Political, Repressive Actions

Abstract

Our country is known as a nation that upholds human rights values. This is manifested in the recognition of the right to express opinions, which is specifically regulated in Law Number 9 of 1998 concerning Freedom of Expression in Public. Along with the increasing dynamics of political contestation and polarization in society, the frequency of demonstrations has also escalated. This condition places the professionalism and neutrality of the police force under increasing public scrutiny. The reduction in citizens' freedom to express their aspirations often creates a negative image of the police, particularly due to repressive actions and the use of discretion that is deemed disproportionate. Based on a normative juridical approach, this study aims to analyze the extent to which the state upholds access and protection of freedom of expression in public, as well as examine the application of human rights principles from both national and international legal perspectives in demonstrations

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2023). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). RajaGrafindo Persada.

Aryanto, B. (2020). Demokrasi deliberatif dalam konsep amandemen konstitusi Indonesia. Mulawarman Law Review. https://ejournal.fh.unmul.ac.id/index.php/mulrev/article/view/366

Deklarasi Universal Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia. (n.d.). Komnas HAM. Diakses 23 September 2025.

Dwipayana, I. K. A. (2025). Demonstrasi sepanjang pemerintahan Prabowo belum genap setahun. Tempo. Diakses 23 September 2025.

Hamid, A. Y. (2020). Kebebasan berpendapat dalam negara hukum demokratis. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(4), 721–740.

Ibrahim, J. (2020). Teori & metodologi penelitian hukum normatif (Cet. ke-4). Bayumedia Publishing.

Muthhar, M. A. (2016). Membaca demokrasi deliberatif Jurgen Habermas dalam dinamika politik Indonesia. Ushuluna, (detail volume/issue tidak tersedia).

Qamar, N. (2016). Hak asasi manusia dalam negara hukum demokrasi human rights in democratic rechtsstaat. Sinar Grafika.

Rahardjo, S. (2000). Hukum dan masyarakat. Angkasa.

Ramadhan, F. (2023). Analisis yuridis terhadap penggunaan gas air mata oleh aparat dalam penanganan demonstrasi. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Prima Justicia, 7(1), 45–58.

Risvandi, A. A. (2022). Teori kekuasaan. Yudabbiru: Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 120–130.

Safitri, D. (2020). Analisis demokrasi Habermas pada teks forum diskusi online RUU Omnibus Law. JIKE: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Efek. https://doi.org/10.32534/jike.v4i01.1099

Sibuea, H. P. (2014). Ilmu negara. Erlangga.

Syafiie, I. K. (2007). Ilmu pemerintahan. Mandar Maju.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengesahan International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Kovenan Internasional tentang Hak-Hak Sipil dan Politik).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat di Muka Umum.

Wijaya, T., & Jayasuriya, K. (2025). Contextualising the 2025 Indonesian protests: Authoritarian-statism, militarisation, and the crisis of social reproduction. Journal of Contemporary Asia. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2025.2564143