Tuntutan Keadilan Penyelidikan Kasus Kematian Arya Daru yang Belum Terjawab oleh Negara dalam Perspektif HAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v2i4.1254Keywords:
Justice, Diplomats, Human Rights, State Obligations, InvestigationAbstract
The death of Diplomat Arya Daru has opened up a space for reflection on the extent to which the state has fulfilled its investigative obligations to guarantee the right to life and the right to truth, as fundamental human rights. The delay and secrecy of the investigation indicate institutional accountability issues and weak mechanisms for protecting the rights of victims and their families. This study uses a doctrinal legal approach to examine the state's position through the perspectives of positive obligations theory and distributive justice, which emphasize the state's active obligation to protect, disclose, and restore citizens' basic rights. The analysis shows that the lack of transparency in the investigative process not only violates the principle of justice but also reflects inequality in the distribution of legal protection. The state should ensure that justice does not stop at the formal level but is realized through transparent, independent investigations based on factual truth. In the context of human rights, the state's passive attitude towards alleged violations of the right to life can be interpreted as a denial of its constitutional and moral responsibilities. This study emphasizes that fulfilling the right to truth is an integral part of distributive justice and is non-negotiable. Thus, the Arya Daru case is an important indicator for assessing the state's seriousness in realizing a legal system that is just, accountable and oriented towards respecting human dignity.
Downloads
References
Aprita, S., & Hasyim, Y. (2020). Hukum dan hak asasi manusia. Bogor: Penerbit Mitra Wacana Media.
Aristawati, P. A. S., & Wati, R. U. (2023). Penegakan hukum dalam pelanggaran hak asasi manusia (HAM). 1(2), 179–187.
Ashri, A. M., & Silvana, S. (2021). Hak atas kebenaran bagi korban penghilangan orang secara paksa periode 1997–1998 hak rakyat atas air bersih sebagai derivasi hak asasi manusia dalam deklarasi universal hak asasi manusia fachriza cakrafaksi limuris kearifan lokal sebagai alasan penghapus. 4(2).
Bakhtiar, H. S. (2025). Kematian Arya Daru, bunuh diri atau pembunuhan? Retrieved November 1, 2025, from Humas FH UPNVJ website: https://hukum.upnvj.ac.id/kematian-arya-daru-bunuh-diri-atau-pembunuhan/
Hukmana, S. Y. (2025). Penyebab keluarga Arya Daru belum dapat hasil autopsi. Retrieved November 9, 2025, from MetroTV website: https://www.metrotvnews.com/read/bw6CglYo-penyebab-keluarga-arya-daru-belum-dapat-hasil-autopsi
Muhdar, M. (2020). Penelitian doctrinal dan non-doctrinal: Pendekatan aplikatif dalam penelitian hukum. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12690.20169
Munir, A. S., Saputri, B. E., & Rachma, S. A. (2022). Extrajudicial killing: Pelanggaran hak atas hidup dan kaitannya dengan asas praduga tak bersalah. Rewang Rencana: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(12), 953–968.
Nations, U. (1961). The United Nations conference on diplomatic intercourse and immunities. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 10(3), 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/10.3.597
Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, & Said, M. Y. (2021). Metodologi normatif dan empiris dalam perspektif ilmu hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14
OHCHR. (2014). United Nations Human Rights Office of The High Commissioner. Geneva. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198749844.003.0004
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rights, T. A. for H. (1991). Manual on the effective prevention and investigation of extra-legal, arbitrary and summary executions. United Nations.
Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Shue, H. (1980). Basic rights: Subsistence, affluence, and U.S. foreign policy. Princeton University Press.
Siregar, G. E. (2020). Pengaturan hukum internasional tentang perlindungan pejabat diplomatik di negara penerima. Lex Et Societatis, 8(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v8i2.28491
Untari, R., & Choirullah, A. F. (2024). Penerapan hukum terhadap pejabat dan diplomat yang menyalahgunakan hak kekebalan dan keistimewaan diplomatik. 4(2), 34–48.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



