Pemberlakuan Restorative Justuce pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi  Dana Desa dengan Kerugian Kecil

Wahyu Taruna Wibowo

doi:10.62383/federalisme.v2i4.1212

Authors

Wahyu Taruna Wibowo Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v2i4.1212

Keywords:

Corruption, Legal Certainty, Petty Corruption, Recovery of State Losses, Restorative Justice

Abstract

The return of state financial losses does not eliminate the criminal penalty for perpetrators of corruption. However, differences in the application of Restorative Justice in corruption cases have created legal uncertainty, especially in resolving corruption cases that involve relatively small state financial losses. This study aims to examine and analyze the implementation of Restorative Justice for perpetrators of corruption in the management of village funds, which are often caused by administrative errors, lack of understanding, or weak supervision rather than intentional acts of enrichment. This type of research is Doctrinal, using the statute approach, namely legal research that focuses on the application and interpretation of normative legal provisions (laws and regulations) as well as a theoretical concept approach to understand justice in a restorative framework. The resolution of village fund corruption cases with small losses should ideally prioritize recovery of losses and community restoration, but cannot eliminate the criminal aspect entirely, so clear legal guidelines are needed to ensure fairness and legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackerman, R. (1997). The role of the World Bank in controlling corruption. Journal of Law and Policy in International Business.

Ahmad, J., et al. (n.d.). Tolerance to petty corruption in public sector: A review. Pakistan Vision, 2(1).

Chairani, D. A. (2020). Upaya pemberantasan “petty corruption” atau pungutan liar pada pelayanan publik. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2).

DetikNews. (2023, Juni 23). Jaksa Agung ingin korupsi di bawah Rp50 juta tak dipidana: Ini alasannya. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5973554/jaksa-agung-ingin-korupsi-di-bawah-rp-50-juta-tak-dipidana-ini-alasannya

Maulana, I., & Agusta, M. (2021, Agustus). Konsep dan implementasi restorative justice di Indonesia. Datin Law Journal, 2(2), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.

Muhdar, M. (2019). Penelitian doctrinal dan non-doctrinal: Pendekatan aplikatif dalam penelitian hukum (hlm. 79). Mulawarman University Press.

Radana, V. (2017). Analisis keadilan restoratif dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana korupsi dengan kerugian negara yang kecil oleh Kejaksaan Negeri Bandar Lampung [Skripsi tidak diterbitkan]. Universitas Lampung.

Republik Indonesia. (2022). Lembar penjelas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.

Riaumandiri.co. (2023, November 30). Kasus penyalahgunaan ADD Kampung Empang Pandan dihentikan. https://www.riaumandiri.co diakses pada pukul 17.07 WITA

Setiawan, E., & Prasetyo, H. (n.d.). Pertimbangan hukum Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia sebagai sarana pencegahan korupsi dalam divestasi badan usaha milik negara. Proceedings of the National Conference for Law Studies: Pembangunan Hukum Menuju Era Digital Society (hlm. 652).

Silitonga, G. F. (2024, Juni 20). Asas lex superior derogate legi inferiori dan kedudukan surat edaran dalam perundang-undangan. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-kisaran/baca-artikel/15099/Asas-lex-superior-derogate-legi-inferiori-dan-Kedudukan-Surat-Edaran-dalam-Perundang-undangan.html

Sitepu, R. I., & Piadi, Y. (2019). Implementasi restorative justice dalam pemidanaan pelaku tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v1i1.7

Sutrisno, et al. (2020, Oktober). Penerapan asas keadilan, kepastian hukum, dan kemanfaatan dalam putusan hakim tindak pidana korupsi. Gorontalo Law Review, 3(2).

Trisna, W., & Mubarak, R. (2017). Kedudukan korban dalam kasus tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 7(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.31289/jap.v7i2.1333