Konstruksi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Perusakan Fasilitas Umum dalam Aksi Massa

Authors

  • Keysa Astiara Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Riska Andi Fitriono Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v3i1.1518

Keywords:

Criminal Law Enforcement, Criminal Liability, Destruction of Public Facilities, Mass Action, Positive Law

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the criminal liability of perpetrators of arson and destruction of public facilities during demonstrations in Indonesia, as well as to examine the enforcement of criminal law against these crimes based on applicable positive law. However, in practice, demonstrations are often accompanied by anarchic actions in the form of arson and destruction of public facilities that harm the public interest and disrupt public order. The urgency of this research lies in the need to ensure that criminal liability and criminal law enforcement for acts of arson and destruction of public facilities are carried out individually and proportionally in accordance with the provisions of the old Criminal Code and the National Criminal Code, in order to prevent the general application of criminal law to participants in demonstrations. The results of the first study indicate that criminal liability for perpetrators of arson and destruction of public facilities during demonstrations has basically been regulated in the old Criminal Code and then updated in the National Criminal Code, especially regarding the crimes of arson and destruction of property. While the second enforcement of criminal law against these acts requires proportional and individual application, even though it is carried out in the context of collective mass action.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arief, B. N. (2010). Kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan kejahatan. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 17(3), 328–345. https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/3885

Arief, B. N. (2011). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Konstitusi Press.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara. Rajawali Pers.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2012). Negara hukum, demokrasi, dan penegakan hak asasi manusia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(2), 193–214. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/209

Hamzah, A. (2010). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Harahap, M. Y. (2012). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan penuntutan. Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, M. Y. (2013). Pembuktian tindak pidana dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 2(1), 1–18. https://jurnalhukumdanperadilan.org/index.php/jurnal/article/view/36

Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Moeljatno. (2015). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (2011). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana. Alumni.

Muladi. (2002). Demokratisasi, hak asasi manusia, dan reformasi hukum di Indonesia. The Habibie Center.

Muladi. (2010). Lembaga pidana bersyarat. Alumni.

Muladi. (2012). Hak asasi manusia dan sistem peradilan pidana. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia, 30(2), 97–110. https://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/projustitia/article/view/1158

Radbruch, G. (2006). Filsafat hukum. Alumni.

Soekanto, S. (2008). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Soekanto, S. (2011). Kesadaran hukum dan efektivitas penegakan hukum. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 13(1), 1–14. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/1348

Sudarto. (2009). Hukum dan hukum pidana. Alumni.

Sudarto. (2010). Asas kemanfaatan dalam pemidanaan. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 39(2), 141–150. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/2415

Wicaksono, B. A. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam tindak pidana yang dilakukan secara bersama-sama. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 9(1), 85–102. https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/ejournal/index.php/jrv/article/view/475

Downloads

Published

2026-02-09

How to Cite

Keysa Astiara, Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih, & Riska Andi Fitriono. (2026). Konstruksi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Perusakan Fasilitas Umum dalam Aksi Massa. Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 3(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v3i1.1518

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.