Tinjauan Hukum Perdata terhadap Penahanan Ijazah dan Kebebasan Berkontrak Berdasarkan Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v2i3.1075Keywords:
Civil Law, Diploma Withholding, Employment Relationship, Freedom of Contrack, Validity of ContractAbstract
The practice of withholding a diploma as a condition of employment is still widespread in employment relationships in Indonesia. Generally, employers argue that withholding a diploma is intended to guarantee that workers complete the agreed-upon work contract period. However, this practice raises legal issues because it has the potential to violate the principle of freedom of contract, especially when viewed in light of the provisions of Article 1320 of the Civil Code (KUH Perdata), which regulates the conditions for a valid agreement. A diploma withholding clause can affect the fulfillment of the element of free agreement, because such clauses are often agreed to under duress or without fair alternatives for workers. This study aims to examine the validity of diploma withholding clauses in employment agreements and assess the legal consequences if such clauses are declared invalid. The research method used is a normative juridical approach by analyzing relevant laws and regulations, legal doctrine, and court decisions. The results of the analysis show that diploma withholding clauses often conflict with the conditions for a valid agreement, especially the element of lawful cause, because they conflict with the principles of protecting workers' rights and the principle of justice in freedom of contract. Furthermore, this practice can lead to human rights violations, considering that diplomas are important personal documents and cannot be confiscated without a clear legal basis. If the diploma retention clause is declared invalid, the clause is null and void and does not bind the parties. Consequently, the employer is obliged to return the diploma to the employee unconditionally, and the employee has the right to claim compensation if they suffer losses due to the retention. This study recommends the need for stricter regulations in employment regulations to prohibit the practice of diploma retention, in order to ensure the creation of fair and equal employment relationships in accordance with the principles of contract law.
Downloads
References
A. Buku
Asyhadie, Z., & Kusuma, R. (2019). Hukum ketenagakerjaan dalam teori dan praktik di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.
Dirdjosisworo, S. (2008). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Magnis-Suseno, F. (1987). Etika sosial: Sebuah pengantar. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Mertokusumo, R. (2018). Pengantar hukum perdata Indonesia.
Rahardjo, S. (2000). Ilmu hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sapoetra, G. K., & Widianingsih, R. G. (1982). Pokok-pokok hukum perburuhan. Bandung: Armico.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Subekti. (2008). Hukum perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Sumardjono, M. S. W. (2001). Asas-asas hukum perjanjian. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Susanti, D. O., & Efendi, A. (2015). Penelitian hukum legal research. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
B. Jurnal / Artikel
Bondarenko, N. L. (2016). Prinsip kebebasan berkontrak dalam hukum perdata Republik Belarus. Buletin Universitas Perm. Ilmu Hukum.
Jurnal Kajian Konstitusi. (2022). Analisis kebebasan berkontrak dalam perjanjian kerja. Jurnal Kajian Konstitusi, 2(1).
Ruslan, D. A. R. (2023). Pengesampingan pasal dalam perjanjian oleh para pihak dikaitkan dengan asas kebebasan berkontrak. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i3.1592
Shliakhovska, I. M. (2023). The contract as the ground for the emergence of rights and obligations. Actual Problems of Improving of Current Legislation of Ukraine, 61, 2–31. https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.61.2.31-2.38
Sopiani, S., Senda, V. N., Muzzamil, M. F., & Anugrah, D. (2024). Implikasi hukum ketidakterpenuhan syarat subjektif dalam Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata terhadap keabsahan perjanjian. Letterlijk, 1(2), 169–182.
Sugiarti, Y. (2020). Keabsahan pemutusan hubungan kerja karena force majeure di masa pandemi Covid-19. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v4i3.26977
Zamroni, M. (2019). Urgensi pembatasan prinsip kebebasan berkontrak dalam perspektif historis. Jurnal Hukum, Universitas Hang Tuah Surabaya. https://doi.org/10.30649/phj.v19i2.211
C. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata).
Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyelenggaraan Ketenagakerjaan.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Perppu Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja.
D. Sumber Internet
Hikmawati, E. (n.d.). Hubungan kerja dan hubungan perburuhan. https://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/public/UEU-paper-6776-K-3_Hubungan_Kerja_dan_Hubungan_Perburuhan.pdf
Jurnal Kajian Konstitusi. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.19184/jkk.v1i3.25599
Salim, H. (2023). Hukum ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. https://journal.pubmedia.id/index.php/lawjustice
Universitas Jember. (n.d.). Repository UNEJ. https://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/101409
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



