Integrasi Prinsip Keadilan Restoratif dalam Proses Perdata: Sebuah Pendekatan Baru Penyelesaian Sengketa
Menawarkan Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Berbasis Pemulihan Hubungan Sosial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/parlementer.v2i4.1384Keywords:
restorative justice, civil law, restorative mediation, social relationship restoration, alternative dispute resolutionAbstract
Indonesia’s civil dispute resolution system remains dominated by an adversarial litigation model that prioritizes legal certainty but often neglects the relational and emotional dimensions underlying conflicts. Yet, in many cases such as family, inheritance, or neighborhood disputes the restoration of social relationships is as crucial as formal legal resolution. This study explores the potential integration of restorative justice principles into Indonesia’s civil procedural law as an alternative approach centered on dialogue, accountability, and reconciliation. Employing a normative-juridical approach and qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal sources, the research finds that restorative justice values align not only with Indonesia’s living law traditions such as musyawarah (deliberative consensus) and customary dispute resolution but also with existing provisions in civil procedure codes. Accordingly, the study proposes the Structured Restorative Mediation (SRM) Model, a procedural framework that embeds restorative principles into both court-annexed and community-based mediation. This model prioritizes relational healing while upholding legal certainty and procedural fairness. Its successful implementation requires regulatory support, enhanced mediator training, and institutional strengthening of community-based dispute resolution bodies. Thus, integrating restorative justice is not merely an innovation but a structural necessity for a more humane, inclusive, and holistically just legal system.
Downloads
References
Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2023). Laporan tahunan statistik perkara pengadilan umum tahun 2023. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/publikasi/statistik
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press.
Kusumawardani, R. (2021). Dimensi sosial dalam sengketa perdata di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Masyarakat, 16(2), 128–142. https://scholar.ui.ac.id/en/publications/dimensi-sosial-dalam-sengketa-perdata-di-indonesia
Marzuki, P. M. (2018). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan tentang metode dan aplikasinya. Kencana.
Nugroho, A. (2023). Perlindungan hak dalam mediasi restoratif. Jurnal Hukum Humaniter, 5(2), 105–120. https://jurnal.unair.ac.id/JHH/article/view/31298
Prasetyo, A. B. (2021). Dinamika penyelesaian sengketa waris dalam masyarakat Jawa. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3876542
Pratama, D. (2023). Kolaborasi multi-pihak dalam pengembangan PSA. Jurnal Hukum Kolaboratif, 2(2), 88–102. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/jhk/article/view/90123
Putra, I. G. N. R. (2020). Peran fasilitator dalam mediasi restoratif. Jurnal Mediasi dan Resolusi Konflik, 4(1), 58–72. https://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/jmrk/article/view/4321
Rahayu, S. (2020). Community-based justice dalam penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, 6(1), 82–97. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jhl/article/view/51234
Setiawan, B. (2022). Efektivitas mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata: Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 8(1), 41–58. https://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/jhp/article/view/8212
Soekanto, S., & Mustafa, A. A. (2022). Living law dan penyelesaian sengketa di masyarakat adat Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.22146/jiuii.v29i1.62324
Sulistyowati, I. (2020). Mediasi perkara perdata di pengadilan: Antara harapan dan realitas. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Litigasi, 12(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.24198/jihl.v12i1.27894
Suryadi, E. (2022). Living law dan penyelesaian sengketa berbasis adat. Jurnal Hukum Adat Nusantara, 7(1), 70–85. https://jurnal.unand.ac.id/index.php/jhan/article/view/88765
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2002). Basic principles on the use of restorative justice programmes in criminal matters (ECOSOC Res. 2002/12). https://www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/ECOSOC_res_2002_12.pdf
Widina. (2023). Hukum acara perdata. Widina.
Widiyani, R. (2019). Keadilan restoratif dalam penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan hidup. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 5(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.24198/jhli.v5i2.25678
Wijaya, H. (2019). Evaluasi keberhasilan keadilan restoratif di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE, 14(3), 198–212. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/dejure/article/view/39876
Wiraguna, S. A., Purwanto, L. M. F., & Widjaja, R. R. (2024). Metode penelitian kualitatif di era transformasi digital. Arsitekta: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.47970/arsitekta.v6i01.524
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Parlementer : Jurnal Studi Hukum dan Administrasi Publik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



