Hak Regres PT PII terhadap Penanggung Jawab Proyek Kerjasama dalam Mekanisme Kerjasama Pemerintah dan Badan Usaha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v2i3.1103Keywords:
Cooperation Project, Infrastructure Guarantee, Legal Responsibility, PPP Scheme, PT PII, Right of RecourseAbstract
The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) scheme with guarantees from PT PII aims to accelerate infrastructure development through private participation, but faces legal and practical challenges, particularly related to the risk of default by the Government and Construction Service Provider (GCA) and the effectiveness of the implementation of recourse rights by PT PII towards government institutions. This study uses a normative juridical method with an analytical descriptive approach through a literature study of primary and secondary legal materials, as well as a qualitative analysis of legal documents, to understand in depth the application of recourse rights to GCA in the PPP mechanism. The application of recourse rights by PT PII as a PPP project guarantor is based on a special legal framework and complex contractual agreements to protect investors from the risk of default by the GCA. However, its implementation has the potential to face legal, political, bureaucratic, and fiscal challenges that can affect the effectiveness of protection and the fiscal sustainability of PT PII. PT PII's recourse rights in the PPP scheme are an adaptation of the borgtocht concept applied lex specialis through the PPP agreement, guarantees, and recourse to protect state finances. However, its implementation faces bureaucratic, budgetary, and fiscal constraints that can hamper its effectiveness. Therefore, binding guidelines and increased institutional capacity are needed to ensure that regress rights can be exercised effectively, accountably, and in accordance with the principles of transparency and accountability. This study concludes that to increase the effectiveness of the PPP scheme, improvements in the legal framework, inter-agency coordination, and strengthening the capacity of institutions involved in implementing regress rights are needed.
Downloads
References
Artikel Jurnal
Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2022). Legal perspective: The role of infrastructure guarantee institution in infrastructure project provision through public-private partnership scheme. Journal of Private and Commercial Law, 6(1), 13-14. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v6i1.35558
Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2022). Legal perspective: The role of infrastructure guarantee institution in infrastructure project provision through public-private partnership scheme. Journal of Private and Commercial Law, 6(1), 13-14. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v6i1.35558
Hendry, I. (2019). Penjaminan proyek kerjasama pemerintah dengan badan usaha melalui badan usaha milik negara ditinjau dari hukum jaminan. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 1(1), 34.
Hendry, I. (2019). Penjaminan proyek kerjasama pemerintah dengan badan usaha melalui badan usaha milik negara ditinjau dari hukum jaminan. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 1(1), 34.
Maria, A. V. N., & Akhmad, B. C. (2024). Analisis efektivitas jaminan perorangan sebagai pemenuhan hak kreditur dalam penyelesaian kredit yang wanprestasi pada Bank X. Lex Patrimonium, 3(1), 6.
Muhammad, H. A. (2022). Pengelolaan risiko kewajiban kontijensi pemerintah pada proyek KPBU. Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.36766/7jw2wq90
Siburian, C. (2018). Tanggung jawab borgtocht terhadap debitur yang dinyatakan pailit. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Fakultas Hukum, 2(2), 11.
Buku Teks
Djuhaendah, H. (1998). Hukum jaminan Indonesia. Proyek ELIPS.
I Wayan, R. (2019). Pembangunan infrastruktur berkelanjutan: Perspektif kebijakan menuju pertumbuhan berkualitas. Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI.
Salim, H. S. (2017). Hukum kontrak: Teori & teknik penyusunan kontrak. Sinar Grafika.
Salim, H. S. (2023). Perkembangan hukum jaminan di Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
Satrio, J. (1996). Hukum jaminan, hak-hak jaminan pribadi: Tentang penanggungan dan akibat-akibatnya. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Subekti. (2005). Hukum perjanjian. Intermasa.
Yusid, T. (2018). Transformasi public private partnership Indonesia. Elex Media Komputindo.
Laporan Instansi/Lembaga/Organisasi/Perusahaan
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Public private partnership: Infrastructure projects plan in Indonesia 2022. Kemenkeu.
Disertasi/Tesis/Paper Kerja
PT Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia. (2024). Laporan tahunan 2023: Navigating changes, embracing opportunities (hlm. 88-90). PT PII.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



