Studi Komparatif Antara Mediasi di Peradilan Perdata dan Upaya Administratif di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v2i4.1366Keywords:
Administrative Measures, Civil Court, Distinction, Mediation, State Administrative CourtAbstract
In accordance with Article 25 paragraph (2) of the Law on Judicial Power, the general judiciary is one part of the judicial power that has the authority to examine, adjudicate, and issue decisions in criminal and civil cases in accordance with the applicable regulations. In civil trial proceedings at the district court, there are three stages: the preliminary stage, the determination stage, and the execution stage. In civil justice, there is an effort to resolve disputes outside of trial, namely mediation, and in administrative court proceedings, there is an effort to resolve disputes outside the court, namely administrative efforts. Mediation is an effort to resolve conflicts through deliberation with the assistance of a neutral third party, known as a mediator, to reach an agreement that can be accepted by both parties. This administrative effort is a resolution process carried out internally within an agency between the government and the party filing an objection to a state administrative decision before the dispute is brought to court. The purpose of this study is to understand the differences in non-litigation efforts between civil courts and state administrative courts. The research method is normative, using a statutory approach that emphasizes the analysis of regulations related to the main discussion of this study. In civil courts, mediation aims and focuses more on efficiency, which benefits both parties and, in turn, can reduce the burden on judges in resolving disputes in court. On the other hand, the purpose of administrative measures in state administrative cases is oriented towards internal government supervision, as a last resort, and rapid correction.
Downloads
References
Artikel Jurnal (satu, dua, atau lebih dari dua penulis)
Hermanto, A., Hidayat, I. N., & Hadaiyatullah, S. S. (2021). Peran dan Kedudukan Mediasi di Pengadilan Agama. As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law, 1(2), 34-59. https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v1i2.11292
Hilda Ananda, & Siti Nur Afifah. (2023). Penyelesaian Secara Litigasi dan Non Litigasi. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah dan Keuangan Islam, 1(1), 55-64.
Mulyani, T., Sukimin, S., & Wijaya, W. S. W. P. (2022). Konsep Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Berbasiskan Nilai Keadilan Pancasila. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 10(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v10i1.5773
Puspitasari Gustami, & Devi Siti Hamzah Marpaung. (2024). Perbandingan Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi di Pengadilan dan di Luar Pengadilan. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(4), 1-13.
Safira Putri Zakia. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pemanfaatan Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Akademik, 2(Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Februari), 69-76.
Saputra, A. (2025). Implementasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Negosiasi dalam Program Kemitraan Badan Usaha Milik Negara. JURNAL SYNTAX IMPERATIF : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 6(3), 752-758. https://doi.org/10.54543/syntaximperatif.v6i3.758
Yati Nurhayati, Ifrani Ifrani, & M. Yasir Said. (2021). Metodologi Normatif dan Empiri dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14
Eugenia Gloria Esther Pandelroot, Presly Prayogo dan Carlo A. Gerungan, "Upaya Administratif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan", Lex Administratum, Vol. 1X, No. 2, 2021. https://doi.org/10.23887/jmpppkn.v2i1.137
Firzhal Arzhi jiwantara, "Upaya Administratif Dan Penerapannya Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi", JATISWARA, Vol. 34 No. 2 Juli 2019. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v34i2.203
Ahmat Yusuf Al Amin, Arif Wibowo, "PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA MELALUI UPAYA ADMINISTRATIF", Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, Vol.2 No.1 Februari 2023. https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v2i1.111
Roy Marthen Moonti, Arifin Tumuhulawa, Yayan Hanapi, Dince Aisa Kodai, Oyald Puhi, "UPAYA ADMINISTRATIF DALAM SENGKETA PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA UPAYA ADMINISTRATIF DALAM SENGKETA PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA", JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, Vol. 9 No. 3 Tahun 2022. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.34-45
Dwi Safitri, Erna. & Sa'adah, Nabiatus. (2021). Penerapan Upaya Administratif Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(1) 35. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.34-45
Ali, Firli Fahresi. J. Pinori, Josephus. & M. Rewah, Reymen. Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Melalui Upaya Administratif Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Lex Administratum, 9(8) 57-60.
Djumardin. (2015) Mediasi Sebagai Pilihan Penyelesaian Perselisihan, JATISWARA, 30(3) 480-484.
Sulaiman, Sumirahayu. dkk. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Melalui Mediasi di Pengadilan, Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(2) 1156.
Buku Teks
Eviningrum, S., & Harianto, D. (2023). Praktek Peradilan Perdata. Deepublish.
Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2023). METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM (NORMATIF DAN EMPIRIS). Penerbit Widina.
Hayatuddin, Ridwan. (2025). Hukum Acara Perdata dan Praktik Peradilan di Indonesia, Kencana: Yogyakarta.
Danialsyah, H. Lubis, Muhammad Ridwan. & Siregar, Gamgom TP. (2023). Hukum Acara Perdata Teori dan Praktek, CV. Santosa Deli Mandiri: Medan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
