Tingkat Relevansi dan Implementasi Landasan Filosofis, Sosiologis, dan Yuridis terhadap Kualitas Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah di Indonesia

Zulrijal Bushido Gani; Najamuddin Gani

doi:10.62383/presidensial.v2i4.1397

Authors

Zulrijal Bushido Gani Universitas Cenderawasih
Najamuddin Gani Universitas Yapis Papua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v2i4.1397

Keywords:

Legal Basis, Philosophical Basis, Quality of Regulations, Regional Regulations, Sociological Basis

Abstract

The formation of regional regulations (Perda) is a constitutional derivative of the implementation of regional autonomy within the framework of the Indonesian legal system. Substantively, Perda function as regulatory instruments aimed at accommodating the specific interests of local communities, in line with fundamental values, contextual needs, and the hierarchy of applicable laws and regulations. However, the high frequency of annulment or cancellation of Perda indicates dissonance or non-compliance with the principles of sound legislative formation. This phenomenon raises the urgency to review the extent to which philosophical, sociological, and legal foundations have been internalized and comprehensively implemented in the regional legislative process. Therefore, this study focuses on analyzing the relevance of these three fundamental foundations to the quality and legitimacy of regional legal products. This study adopts a normative-juridical legal research method, involving descriptive analysis of the corpus of laws and regulations, legal doctrine, and the empirical practice of Perda formation. The results highlight that: the philosophical foundation provides a normative orientation in the form of ethical-teleological values and goals; the sociological foundation reflects the actual needs and social realities of the communities subject to regulation; Meanwhile, the legal basis guarantees formal legality and vertical and horizontal consistency with the national legal system. Key findings indicate that these three foundations are inherently relevant and complementary in determining the quality of regional regulations. Synergy and harmonious integration between them are essential prerequisites for producing regional legal products that have legal validity, are capable of upholding substantive justice, and are responsive to the dynamics of public needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). Konstitusi ekonomi. Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Daeng, Y., Rahman, A., Putra, D., & Lestari, M. (2023). Kajian terhadap faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum pidana di Indonesia. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(5), 6030–6038.

Handayani, R., & Firmansyah, T. (2024). Harmonisasi peraturan daerah dalam konteks otonomi daerah: Tinjauan implementatif dan evaluatif. Jurnal Legislasi & Kebijakan Indonesia, 7(1), 78–94.

Kurniawati, I. A., & Saputra, M. (2022). Analisis judicial review terhadap peraturan daerah di Indonesia: Faktor penyebab dan implikasi. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 52(4), 520–537.

Laia, S. W., & Daliwu, S. (2022). Urgensi landasan filosofis, sosiologis, dan yuridis dalam pembentukan undang-undang yang bersifat demokratis di Indonesia. Jurnal Education and Development, 10(1), 546–552.

Nugraha, A. S. (2023). Tantangan kualitas pembentukan peraturan daerah di era desentralisasi: Kajian atas pembatalan Perda. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 11(3), 211–229.

Prasojo, E., & Kurniawan, T. (2020). Reformasi birokrasi dan penguatan otonomi daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 17(2), 101–115.

Rahardjo, S. (1996). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahman, A., & Nugroho, R. (2023). Harmonisasi peraturan daerah dalam sistem hukum nasional pasca desentralisasi. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 20(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v20i3.1022

Rahmat, R., & Siregar, B. (2022). Evaluasi kualitas legislasi daerah: Harmonisasi peraturan perundang-undangan dan kebutuhan publik. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(2), 145–164.

Rawls, J. (2006). A theory of justice (Terj. bahasa Indonesia). Oxford University Press.

Sari, D. M. (2024). Partisipasi publik dalam pembentukan peraturan daerah sebagai perwujudan demokrasi lokal. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(2), 133–147.

Sari, F. D., & Yuliana, N. (2025). Pembentukan Perda responsif sosial: Perspektif sosiologis dan yuridis dalam otonomi daerah. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik Indonesia, 10(1), 99–117.

Sofiatun, & Sapardiyono. (2024). Optimalisasi peraturan daerah sebagai instrumen pembangunan berbasis daerah di Kabupaten Purworejo. Eksaminasi: Jurnal Hukum, 3(4), 209–217.

Sutiyo, & Maharjan, K. L. (2021). Decentralization and local governance in Indonesia: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 8(1), 1–15.

Utami, T., Prasetyo, A., & Lestari, N. (2025). Analisis yuridis terhadap penerapan prinsip legalitas dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Journal Customary Law, 2(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47134/jcl.v2i3.4048

Utami, W., & Prabowo, H. (2021). Konstitusionalitas peraturan daerah dan perlindungan hukum publik. Jurnal Konstitusi & Perundang-undangan, 3(2), 117–132.

Wibowo, A. (2022). Kualitas legislasi daerah dan implikasinya terhadap efektivitas otonomi daerah. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 52(3), 389–405.