Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 terhadap Demokratisasi Pemilihan Kepala Daerah

Authors

  • Muhammad Anwar Soleh Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Durohim Amnan Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v1i3.85

Keywords:

Implications, Constitutional Court Decision, Election Democratization

Abstract

This study will discuss how the implications of the MK 60/PUU-XXII/2024 decision on the 2024 simultaneous regional election contestation and how the idealita (ideal concept) threshold for the nomination of regional heads in the election system in Indonesia. This study also aims to address the issue of the threshold of the nomination, both the nomination of the president and the nomination of regional heads which from time to time always cause problems and difficult to find a middle point. Type of research used normative-juridical approach to legislation and cases as well as research used library (library research) with secondary data. The results of the discussion are the result of this decision, namely the potential of each political party to propose a candidate for Regional Head is increasingly wide open and the competition is believed to be increasingly competitive which can produce a skilled and qualified leader because it has gone through a rigorous competition process from each candidate proposed by a political party. This implication is a space that has been awaited by political parties and the community because the more candidates for regional heads, the more choices that can be investigated by the community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Airlangga, S. P. (2019). Hakikat penguasa dalam negara hukum demokratis. Jurnal Cepalo, 3(1).

Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Hukum tata negara dan pilar-pilar demokrasi. Konstitusi Press.

Bentham, D., & Boyle, K. (2000). Demokrasi: 80 tanya jawab. Kanisius.

Hartono, H. (2024). Urgensi putusan MK Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 terhadap penyelenggaraan Pilkada tahun 2024. Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 1(4).

Irawan, B. B. (2007). Perkembangan demokrasi di negara Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 5(1).

Mufti, M., & Naafisah, D. D. (2013). Teori-teori demokrasi. CV. Pustaka Setia.

Pratiwi, A. A. (2024). Pakar hukum UNAIR soroti dampak putusan MK terhadap pelaksanaan pilkada. Unair News. https://unair.ac.id/pakar-hukum-unair-soroti-dampak-putusan-mk-terhadap-pelaksanaan-pilkada/

Salinan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024.

Salinan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2013). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tim Redaksi. (2024). Apa itu Purcell Principle terkait putusan MA tentang usia calon kepala daerah? Voi.Id. https://voi.id/berita/388023/apa-itu-purcell-principle

Triana, Y., Khairina, E., & Fadhlurrohman, M. I. (2023). Kajian prinsip demokrasi dalam pemilihan umum di Indonesia. Jurnal Transformative, 9(1).

Published

2024-09-03

How to Cite

Muhammad Anwar Soleh, & Durohim Amnan. (2024). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 terhadap Demokratisasi Pemilihan Kepala Daerah. Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik, 1(3), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v1i3.85