Penerapan Hukum Darurat Militer Saat Konflik Gerakan Aceh Merdeka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/referendum.v1i4.376Keywords:
Martial Law, Free Aceh MovementAbstract
The emergence of the resistance movement, of course, because there are factors that influence it. The birth of DI/TII in Aceh was caused by the central government's policy to merge Aceh province into North Sumatra province on August 8, 1950. This paper will explain the application of emergency military law. Specifically during the conflict that occurred in the Aceh region which led to the formation of the Free Aceh Movement from 1976 to 2005. By using normative legal research methods. The trigger for the proclamation of Aceh's independence was the exploitation of Aceh's natural resources during the Soeharto era, where petroleum and natural gas were managed by Exxon Mobil Oil Indonesia which caused regional sentiment, that all Aceh's wealth was sent to Jakarta, even Hasan Tiro once said Aceh should have the advantage of its natural resources like Brunei Darussalam. The Presidential Decree (Keppres) to launch a massive military operation in Aceh had been drafted long before, after cabinet meetings held at the Palace, as well as through the deliberations of the people's representatives in Senayan, Jakarta in early 2003. The aim was to crush the Free Aceh Movement (GAM). The Helsinki MOU is one of the negotiations carried out between the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement held in Helsinki, Finland, August 15, 2005 creating a new system and method of relations between the central government and the Aceh government, which is fully supported by the international community.
Downloads
References
Anthony Bebbington, Institutional Pathway to Equity: addressing inequality traps,World Bank, Washington D.C, 2008.
Aspinall Edward, “Violence and Identity Formation in Aceh under Indonesia Rule,” inVerandah of Violence. ed by Antony Reid. (Singapore: Singapore University Press, 2006).
Irine Hiraswari Gayatri, Tarik Ulur ke Indonesiaan dan keAcehan, dalam Firman Noor (ed), Nasionalisme, Demokrasi dan Sentimen Premodial di Indonesia, LIPI Press, Jakarta, 2008.
Kajian MoU Helsinki dan UUPA Dalam Aspek Implementasi (Empiris), Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Aceh, Tahun 2019.
Moch. Nurhasim, dkk., Konflik Aceh: Analisis atas Sebab-sebab Konflik, Aktor Konflik, Kepentingan dan Upaya Penyelesaian, (Jakarta: LIPI).
Pusat Pendidikan Hukum TNI-AD, Hukum Tata Negara Darurat, Jakarta 1981. Pemerintah kembali mendasari Reglemen SOB karena dengan mendasari UU.7/1946 ternyata tidak mampu mengatasi situasi pada Perang Kemerdekaan I dan Pemberontahan PKI Madiun.
Robert W. Hefner, Civil Islam: Muslim and Democratization in Indonesia (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).
Sedarmayanti & Syarifudin Hidayat, Metodologi Penelitian, Bandung : Mandar Maju, 2002.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mahmudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003).
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perpu) Nomor 23 Tahun 1959 tentang Pencabutan Undang-Undang Nomor 74 Tahun 1957 (Lembaran Negara Nomor 160 Tahun 1957) dan Penetapan Keadaan Bahaya
Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesi Penguasa Darurat Militer Pusat Nomor 43 Tahun 2003 (43/2003) Tentang Pengaturan Kegiatan Warga Negara Asing, Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat Dan Jurnalis Di Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam
Majalah Ekspos, 60 Tahun Indonesia antara Kejayaan dan Kebangkrutan, Edisi Agustus 2005.
https://kumparan.com/acehkini/megawati-teken-keppres-darurat-militer-18-tahun-silam-sejarah-kelam-aceh-1vm2ZALqfae/3 diakses pada tanggal 01 September 2024 pukul 14:20 WIB.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.