Mega Korupsi Tata Niaga Timah Rp 300 Triliun: Analisis Pelanggaran Prinsip Pancasila dan Etika Tata Kelola Dalam Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/desentralisasi.v2i4.1238Keywords:
Corruption, Good Governance, Natural Resources, Pancasila, TinAbstract
The Rp 300 trillion tin trade mega-corruption case is one of the largest corruption scandals in the history of Indonesian natural resource management. This study aims to analyze violations of Pancasila principles and ethical governance in the tin trade mega-corruption case, and to identify threats to Indonesian natural resource management. The study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. Data were collected through documentary studies of law enforcement reports, government documents, media reports, and related literature. Data analysis was conducted thematically within the theoretical framework of Pancasila, good governance, and public ethics. The findings indicate that this case violates all of Pancasila's tenets, particularly the second (Just and Civilized Humanity) and fifth (Social Justice for All Indonesian People). There were violations of governance principles including transparency, accountability, participation, the rule of law, and effectiveness. The modus operandi involved collusion between business actors, state officials, and law enforcement officers. The mega-allegations reflect a systemic failure in natural resource management that contradicts the constitutional mandate and Pancasila values. Structural reforms are needed in mining governance, enforcement of the integrity of the apparatus, and public participation in supervision.
Downloads
References
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Dwiyanto, A. (2011). Mengembalikan Kepercayaan Publik Melalui Reformasi Birokrasi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hidayat, S., & Salim, E. (2018). Konflik Kepentingan dalam Perizinan Tambang: Studi Kasus di Lima Provinsi Indonesia. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 4(2), 145-168. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v4i2.285.
Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2022). Laporan Tren Korupsi Sektor Pertambangan 2017-2021. Jakarta: ICW.
Kaelan. (2016). Pendidikan Pancasila. Yogyakarta: Paradigma.
Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling Corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2009). Is Transparency the Key to Reducing Corruption in Resource-Rich Countries? World Development, 37(3), 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.07.002.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Pope, J. (2000). Confronting Corruption: The Elements of a National Integrity System. Berlin: Transparency International.
Prasetyo, A. D. (2021). Good Governance dalam Pengelolaan Tambang: Analisis Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas di Sektor Pertambangan Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.31289/jap.v12i1.4521.
Santoso, B. (2020). Korupsi Sektor Pertambangan di Indonesia: Akar Masalah dan Strategi Pemberantasan. Indonesian Journal of Public Policy Review, 15(2), 234-256. https://doi.org/10.21787/ijppr.2020.15.2.234.
Transparency International Indonesia. (2023). Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: TI Indonesia.
Transparency International. (2011). Corruption in the Mining Sector. Berlin: Transparency International.
United Nations Development Programme. (2007). Governance for Sustainable Human Development. New York: UNDP.
Wijaya, A. (2019). Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila dalam Pencegahan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(2), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.24269/jpk.v4.n2.2019.pp45-62.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



