Rekonstruksi Sanksi Tindak Pidana Anak pada Tahap Penyidikan: Analisis Integratif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam di Polres Bungo, Jambi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/desentralisasi.v3i1.1548Keywords:
Investigation Stage, Juvenile Criminal Sanctions, Legal Harmonization, Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿah, Restorative JusticeAbstract
This study uses an integrated analysis of positive law and Islamic law at Polres Bungo to investigate the reconstruction of sanctions for juvenile offenders during the investigation stage. Empirical trends suggest a procedural and administrative orientation that may restrict substantive rehabilitation, even though Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Juvenile Criminal Justice System Act) formally adopts restorative justice, diversion, and the best interests of the child as guiding principles. Using a multidisciplinary approach that integrates statutory, theological-normative (shar‘i), and historical considerations, this study uses a normative qualitative design based on library research. The theoretical framework incorporates maqāṣid al-sharīʿah as a normative evaluation instrument, legal effectiveness theory, and punishment theories. The findings reveal a conceptual convergence between Indonesian positive law and Islamic criminal jurisprudence in differentiating criminal responsibility based on maturity and prioritizing rehabilitation over retribution. There are still differences, nevertheless, when it comes to age criteria and the classification of sanctions: Islamic law places more emphasis on moral and biological maturity (baligh and tamyīz), whereas positive law focuses on strict legislative boundaries. The predominance of formal legality over psychosocial assessment at the investigative level runs the risk of undermining rehabilitative goals. In order to maintain proportionality and child protection, this study suggests a reconstructive paradigm that operationalizes maqāṣid-based principles, combines thorough psychological evaluation, and improves diversion measures. In addition to realistically advancing the creation of a more equitable, rehabilitative, and child-centered investigative framework, the research theoretically advances the conversation about harmonizing state and Islamic law.
Downloads
References
Arief, B. N. (2011). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana. Kencana.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkc67tg
Hadisuprapto, P. (2010). Peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia. Universitas Diponegoro.
Hamzah, A. (2010). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Hanafi, A. (1998). Asas-asas hukum pidana Islam. Bulan Bintang.
Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure theory of law. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520312296
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (1998). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana. Alumni.
Soekanto, S. (1983). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.
Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



