Sistem Pengawasan Profesi Notaris di Indonesia dan Belanda: Studi Komparatif atas Mekanisme Akuntabilitas dan Etika Jabatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/desentralisasi.v2i3.838Keywords:
civil law system, Indonesia, legal profession, Netherlands, Notary supervision, professional ethicsAbstract
This study examines the comparative supervision systems of notarial professions in Indonesia and the Netherlands using a normative and comparative legal approach. In Indonesia, notary supervision is centralized under the Ministry of Law and Human Rights through supervisory councils, yet remains weak in terms of independence and transparency. In contrast, the Netherlands adopts a decentralized and independent model through institutions such as the KNB, the Notarial Disciplinary Board, and the BFT, which ensure accountability and public oversight. The findings reveal that the Dutch system is more effective in enforcing professional ethics and preventing conflicts of interest through mandatory reporting and peer evaluations. The study suggests reforming Indonesia’s supervisory framework by strengthening institutional independence, enhancing the role of professional associations, and ensuring greater transparency. This research aims to contribute to the development of a more accountable and integrity-based notarial supervision system in civil law jurisdictions.
Downloads
References
Alting, M. (2002). Notarial supervision and disciplinary law in the Netherlands. European Journal of Law Reform, 4(3), 345–357.
Bureau Financieel Toezicht. (2016). Annual Report BFT 2016. https://www.bureauft.nl/
CEPEJ. (2016). European judicial systems: Efficiency and quality of justice. Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/cepej
Firdaus, F. (2021). Problematika Pengawasan dan Penindakan Notaris oleh Majelis Pengawas. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no2.2971
KNB. (2024). Koninklijke Notariële Beroepsorganisatie: Jaarverslag 2023. https://www.knb.nl
Mardani, M. (2020). Urgensi Independensi dan Akuntabilitas Profesi Notaris. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(1), 25–38.
Muttaqin, H. (2018). Etika Profesi dan Tantangan Independensi Notaris di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 7(1), 44–58. https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id
Noer, S. (2018). Evaluasi Kinerja Majelis Pengawas Notaris dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Kode Etik Profesi. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 7(2), 231–245. https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan HAM. (2020). Laporan Tahunan Evaluasi Pengawasan Notaris. Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI.
Saputri, A. R. (2024). Reformasi Pengawasan Notaris di Indonesia: Kajian terhadap Transparansi dan Independensi. Path of Science: International Electronic Scientific Journal, 10(5), 40–52. https://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/2204
Setiawan, M. A. (2022). Kelembagaan Notaris dan Potensi Konflik Kepentingan. Jurnal Hukum Responsif, 10(1), 13–25.
Udayana Journal of Law and Culture. (2023). Peran Organisasi Profesi dalam Mendorong Etika Profesi Notaris di Indonesia. UJLC, 7(1), 61–75. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ujlc
Vergentis. (2018). The Role of the Disciplinary System in Dutch Legal Professions. Vergentis – Revista de Investigación de la Facultad de Derecho, 5(2), 3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.