Studi Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Kantor Kecamatan Leihitu Barat, Kabupaten Maluku Provinsi Maluku

Authors

  • Nurul Fatah Tuhelelu Universitas Pattimura
  • Hendry Selanno Universitas Pattimura
  • Julia Theresia Patty Universitas Pattimura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v2i3.1020

Keywords:

government service, Leihitu Barat, public service, service dimensions, service quality, sub-district office, qualitative study, Zeithaml

Abstract

This study aims to explain and analyze the quality of public services at the Leihitu Barat District Office. Quality public service is a key indicator in assessing the performance of local governments, particularly at the sub-district level, which directly provides services to the community. This research uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach to gain an in-depth understanding of the current service conditions. The informants in this study totaled 10 people, consisting of district officials and community members who use the services. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations of service activities at the sub-district office, and documentation of relevant supporting documents. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive qualitative analysis with a case study approach, providing a comprehensive picture of existing problems and potentials. The assessment of service quality is based on Zeithaml’s theory, which includes five main dimensions: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. The research findings indicate that the quality of public services at the Leihitu Barat District Office has not yet met optimal standards. In terms of tangibles, it was found that physical facilities such as waiting areas, service desks, and supporting equipment are still very limited. The reliability dimension is also not well fulfilled, as the service processes are often inconsistent and not timely. The assurance dimension reflects a lack of professional ability and attitudes among officials in providing a sense of security and trust to the public. However, the dimensions of responsiveness and empathy show relatively positive developments. Some officials have demonstrated responsive and empathetic attitudes in addressing the needs and complaints of the public. Nonetheless, comprehensive improvements are still necessary. These include enhancing the quality of human resources, increasing the availability of physical infrastructure, and improving service management systems. By addressing these areas, public services at the Leihitu Barat District Office can become more effective and better aligned with community expectations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Dwiyanto. (2017). Manajemen pelayanan publik: Peduli, inklusif, dan kolaborasi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Badan Pusat Statistik Nasional. (2024). Kecamatan Leihitu Barat dalam angka. Masohi: BPS Kabupaten Maluku Tengah/BPS–Statistics Maluku Tengah Regency.

Dwiyanto, A., Ratminto, & dkk. (2017). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. Sleman: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Finanda, A. S., Fadhila, J. F., & Hayat. (2024). Implementasi prinsip-prinsip pelayanan publik. Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 9(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.22225/pi.9.1.2024.74-78

Gerdha Ninda Mutiafera. (2021). Kualitas pelayanan publik di Kantor Kecamatan Sedayu Kabupaten Bantul.

Halawa, S. A. (2019). Kualitas pelayanan publik pada pelayanan administrasi terpadu di Kecamatan Sungai Ambawang Kabupaten Kubu Raya. Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri. https://ejournal.ipdn.ac.id/khatulistiwa/article/view/560/400

Hardiansyah. (2008). Kualitas pelayanan publik: Konsep, dimensi, indikator, dan implementasinya. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Hendrawan, A. (2021). Peran kecamatan dalam pembangunan daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1234/jap.v12i1.5678

Janah, P., Raudah, S., & Fahmi, Y. (2024). Kualitas pelayanan Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (PDAM) UNIT IKK Ampuh Kecamatan Dusun Tengah Kabupaten Barito Timur. Jurnal Penelitian PDAM, 1(4), 5.

Katharina, R. (2021). Pelayanan publik & pemerintahan digital Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Maiyashi Depiyani. (2017). Pengaruh kepemimpinan camat dalam meningkatkan pelayanan administrasi pada Kantor Kecamatan Sungai Kunjang Kota Samarinda.

Mimbar Rakyat News. (2025, Februari 2). Mirisnya pelayanan kantor camat Leihitu Barat, warga minta perhatian bupati. Mimbar Rakyat News. https://mimbarrakyatnews.id/mirisnya-pelayanan-kantor-camat-leihitu-barat-warga-minta-perhatian-bupati/

Mulyadi, D. (2015). Studi kebijakan publik dan pelayanan publik. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV.

Mulyadi, G., & Afandi. (2018). Administrasi publik untuk pelayanan publik. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV.

Putra, H. H., & Pebrianto, Y. (2022). Pengaruh kualitas pelayanan terhadap kepuasan masyarakat dalam pembuatan surat keterangan ahli waris di Kantor Kecamatan Banjaran Kabupaten Bandung. https://yrpipku.com/journal/index.php/msej/article/view/716

Riduan, A. (2021). Kualitas pelayanan publik pada Kantor Camat Labuan Amas Utara Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Tengah. Al Iidara Balad: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 3(1), 1–10. https://ejurnal.stiaamuntai.ac.id/index.php/aliidarabalad/article/download/28/29/51

Sinambela, L. P. (2008). Reformasi pelayanan publik: Teori, kebijakan dan implementasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Suryantoro, B., & Kusdayana, Y. (2020). Analisis kualitas pelayanan publik pada Politeknik Pelayaran Surabaya. Jurnal Pelayanan Publik, 3(2).

Winarno, B. (2012). Kebijakan publik: Teori, proses, dan studi kasus. Yogyakarta: Center for Academic Publishing Service.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-29

How to Cite

Tuhelelu, N. F., Selanno, H., & Patty, J. T. (2025). Studi Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Kantor Kecamatan Leihitu Barat, Kabupaten Maluku Provinsi Maluku. Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, Dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(3), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v2i3.1020

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.