Penerapan Doktrin Identifikasi dalam Menentukan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Atas Tindak Pidana Korupsi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/referendum.v2i2.779Keywords:
Identification Doctrine, Corporation, Criminal Liability, Corruption CrimeAbstract
This study aims to examine the extent to which the identification doctrine is applied in establishing corporate criminal liability for acts of corruption. The increasing number of corruption cases involving corporate entities poses a challenge for the criminal justice system in attributing legal fault to legal persons that lack independent intent or will. The objective of this research is to analyze how the identification doctrine is utilized to bridge this issue and to assess its effectiveness and fairness in judicial practice. This study employs a normative legal approach using qualitative methods through the analysis of statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and court decisions. The findings indicate that although the identification doctrine provides a logical foundation for prosecuting corporations through the actions of their directors or executives, its application still faces challenges in distinguishing between individual actions taken personally and those undertaken on behalf of the corporation. This ambiguity may result in legal uncertainty and injustice in the enforcement of criminal sanctions. Therefore, clear and firm criteria are necessary in determining corporate criminal liability to support a more just and accountable legal system.
Downloads
References
Adi Nugraha, D. (2014). Prinsip Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Nomor 812/Pid.Sus/2010/PN.BJM dan Putusan Nomor 36/Pid.Sus/TPK/2014/PN.Jkt.Pst). Recidive, 3(No 2). https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/recidive/article/view/40495
Ali, M. (2011). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Ali, M. (2013). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Amalia, S. (2022). Analisis Dampak Korupsi Pada Masyarakat (Studi Kasus Korupsi Pembangunan Shelter Tsunami di Kecamatan Labuan Kabupaten Pandeglang). Epistemik: Indonesian Journal of Social and Political Science, 3(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.57266/epistemik.v3i1.77
Anandya, D., & Ramdhana, K. (2024). Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Korupsi Tahun 2023. Indonesia Corruption Watch.
Azzahra Hakim, A. (2019). Implementasi Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dan Pengurus Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembalakan Liar (Illegal Logging): Analisis Kritis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan [Skripsi, Universitas Indonesia]. https://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2019-10/20492713-S-Pdf-aulia%20Azzahra%20Hakim.pdf#digital#digital
Box, S. (2002). Power, Crime and Mystification. Taylor and Francis.
Clough, J. (2017). Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Criminal Liability: Old Challenges in a Transnational World. ANU Press.
Corruption Perceptions Index 2024. (2025, February 11). Transparency.Org. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024
de Maglie, C. (2005). Models of Corporate Criminal Liability in Comparative Law. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 4(3). https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1213&context=law_globalstudies
Dewi Silvana, E., & Wicaksana, A. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Direktur Utama Terkait Pelanggaran Prinsip Fiduciary Duty. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v4i5.15132
Dsouza, M. (2020). The corporate agent in criminal law–An argument for comprehensive identification. The Cambridge Law Journal, 79(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197320000021
Franssen, V. (2019). Corporate Criminal Liability and Groups of Corporations: A Need for a More Economic Approach? In White Collar Crime. Hart Publishing.
Gobert, J. (2011). Squaring the Circle: The Relationship between Individual and Organizational Fault. In European Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability. Routledge.
Hatrik, H. (1996). Asas pertanggung jawaban Korporasi dalam hukum pidana Indonesia (Strict Liability dan vicarious liability). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hetler, A. (2025). FTX scam explained: Everything you need to know. WhatIs. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/feature/FTX-scam-explained-Everything-you-need-to-know
Kristian. (2013). Urgensi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 44(4).
Kristin, T., Sudiro, A., & Sugiharta, N. (2022). Responsibility Of The Board Of Directors For Violations Of Good Corporate Governance Principles In Company Management. Indonesia Private Law Review, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v3i2.2373
Muladi, M., & Priyatno, D. (2010). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mulyati, N. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Rajawali Pers.
Mustikasari, E. (2024). Dekonstruksi Hukum Korporasi Si Pembuat Delik: Untuk Penentuan Tanggung Jawab Korporasi Berdasarkan Klasifikasi Tipologi Partisipasi Tindak Pidana (Cetakan Ke 1). PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Poindexter, C. A. (2016). Criminal and civil liability for corporations officers and directors. Thomson Reuters. https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/-/media/files/nrf/nrfweb/imported/20160801---criminal-and-civil-liability-for-corporations-officers-and-directors.pdf
Saleh, R. (1988). Lembaran Kepustakaan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Sarre, R. (2011). Penalising Corporate ‘Culture’: The Key to Safer Corporate Activity? In J. Gobert & A.-M. Pascal (Eds.), European Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability (p. 86). New York: Routledge.
Setiyono, H. (2005). Kejahatan Korporasi: Analisis Viktimologi dan Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana (Cetakan Ketiga). Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2007). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi. Jakarta: Grafiti Pers.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2017). Ajaran Pemidanaan: Tindak Pidana Korporasi & Seluk Beluknya. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sjawie, H. F. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Edisi Pertama). Jakarta: Kencana.
Stessens, G. (1994). Corporate Criminal Liability: A Comparative Perspective. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 43(3), 495–519.
Suhariyonto, B. (2021). Model Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pada Perkara Korupsi Di Indonesia [Disertasi, Universitas Indonesia]. https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20517522&lokasi=lokal
Sundusing, M. (2025, April 25). Measuring the Criminal Liability of Directors in Corporate Crimes. ADCO Law. https://adcolaw.com/blog/measuring-the-criminal-liability-of-directors-in-corporate-crimes/
Yahya, B. (2017). Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Korporasi Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara. Disertasi, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
