Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Konstruksi Hukum Tanggung Renteng: Studi Putusan No. 833/Pdt.G/2024/PN Jkt.Utr

Pangeran M S Sitorus

doi:10.62383/pk.v3i1.1485

Authors

Pangeran M S Sitorus Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/pk.v3i1.1485

Keywords:

Business Dispute, Civil Liability, Default, Joint and Several Liability, Multi-Party Agreement

Abstract

The development of the modern business world is marked by the increasing complexity of legal relationships between business actors, involving various entities with close economic and operational interconnections. This condition creates challenges in civil dispute resolution, especially when default occurs in multi-party business agreements. This study aims to analyze the application of the joint and several liability (tangung renteng) legal construction as a business dispute resolution mechanism in the Decision of the North Jakarta District Court Number 833/Pdt.G/2024/PN Jkt.Urr. This research uses normative legal research methods with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials in the form of legislation and court decisions, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of legal books and journals, which are analyzed descriptively-analytically. The results show that the panel of judges applied the joint and several liability construction not only based on formal contractual relationships, but also on the factual and economic interconnections between the parties, such as the receipt of benefits, operational integration, and the commingling of assets between the business entity and its management. The application of this construction proves effective in expanding the basis of liability and guaranteeing the recovery of creditor's rights. However, the decision also shows limitations in proving commercial immaterial losses, which are still bound by strict civil evidence standards. This study concludes that the joint and several liability construction can be an important instrument in resolving multi-party business disputes, but clearer jurisprudential guidelines are needed to ensure legal certainty and consistency of its application in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alif, Violenza, Ali Abdullah, & Dian Purwaningrum. (2025). Upaya perlindungan hukum bagi pihak ketiga yang asetnya termasuk dalam harta pailit. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.2378

Annisa, et al. (2024). Hukum Bisnis. Agam: Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.

Aprilia, D., Devita, D., Dinova Eka Putra, L., Hidayatul Khusnah, L., Nailatuz Zam Ruddiah, S., Sundari, S., & Virsanda Mizhaluna Winata. (2024). Hukum perdata sebagai penghubung antara perseorangan dengan badan hukum. Lentera Ilmu, 1(2), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.59971/li.v1i2.49

Ardiansyah, F., Abdul Aziz, & Rahmad Lubis. (2025). Problematika hukum dalam pembagian harta bersama pada perkara perceraian: Studi kasus putusan pengadilan agama di Brebes. JIM-HKI-STAINI, 3(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i3.1601

Badri, et al. (2024). Ganti rugi terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum dan wanprestasi dalam sistem hukum perdata. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2), 974-985. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9440

Basyra, T. P., Ratna Permata, R., & Sudaryat, S. (2025). Penerapan asas kepastian hukum dan keadilan dalam putusan pengadilan niaga Semarang nomor 3/Pdt. Sus-HKI-Merek/2024/PN Niaga Smg. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(3). https://doi.org/10.62281/41ay1635

Dzikri, N., & Baharudin, B. (2026). Analisis hukum bisnis terhadap implementasi penanaman modal berbasis potensi daerah di Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung. JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM, 19(01), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v19i01.1396

Elia, J. M., Hasim Purba, & Eko Yudhistira. (2025). Tinjauan terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum dalam perjanjian sub-kontrak pembangunan perumahan (Studi putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1490 K/Pdt/2019). Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 6(2), 541-556. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v6i2.991

Embon, C. F., & Anak Agung Angga Primantari. (2025). Tanggung jawab debitur terhadap wanprestasi perjanjian utang piutang berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 3(10). https://doi.org/10.62281/41ay1635

Martinelli, I., & Pabeangi, J. D. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban perdata dalam kasus penyalahgunaan rekening escrow: Analisis yuridis perbuatan melawan hukum dalam putusan MA No. 2685 K/PDT/2024. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 5(2), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.3153/humaniora.v5i2

Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Nugroho, W. A., Citranu, C., Amalia, M., Fitrianita, I., Thesia, E. H., Rohman, M. M., Dwiyanti, A., Rahim, E., & Fitri, H. (2024). Sistem Hukum & Peradilan Di Indonesia: Teori Dan Praktik. Jambi: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Purnama, M. D., Farhan, M., Aziiz, M. A., Rozani, F. F., & Nuripma, I. M. (2025). Analisis yuridis terkait rencana pemberian hak kekayaan intelektual terhadap sound horeg di Jawa Timur. Ijtihad, 19(2), 291-316. https://doi.org/10.21111/ijtihad.v19i2.15060

Purwaningtyas, R. A. R., & Sulistiyantoro, H. (2024). Analisis yuridis wanprestasi dalam kontrak public and private partnership. Kabillah: Journal of Social Community, 9(2), 578-584. https://doi.org/10.35127/kabillah.v9i2.484

Putri, M. P. D. S., Kn SH, M., Wibowo, K. T., & SH, M. H. (2025). Hukum Perusahaan Kontemporer. Serang Banten: Sada Kurnia Pustaka.

Salsabila, A. N., & Djajaputera, G. (2024). Kewajiban bagi debitur yang melakukan wanprestasi kepada kreditur dalam kasus kredit macet. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(1), 667-676. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i1.1300

Subekti. (2020). Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Sukadana, D. A. P. (2025). Implikasi yuridis wanprestasi dalam hukum perdata antara teori dan praktik. Jurnal Rechtens, 14(1), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v14i1.4292

Theresia, E. (2022). Perkembangan dan status kedudukan hukum atas persekutuan komanditer atau commanditaire vennootschap (CV) di Indonesia. Fiat Iustitia: Jurnal Hukum, 114-124. https://doi.org/10.54367/fiat.v3i1.2133

Vaustine, G., & Purwanti, P. A. (2024). Mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa wanprestasi dalam hukum perdata Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v5i4.1371