Teori Hukum Era Robert Nonet dan Philip Selznick Serta Relevansinya Terhadap Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia

Shela Zulfa Syifaurrohmah

doi:10.62383/desentralisasi.v2i4.1287

Authors

Shela Zulfa Syifaurrohmah Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/desentralisasi.v2i4.1287

Keywords:

Indonesian Law, Nonet-Selznick, Responsive Law, Socio-Legal Studies, Sustainable Development

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relationship between the concept of responsive law developed by Robert Nonet and Philip Selznick and the benefits of sustainable development in the context of Indonesian law. Using normative legal research methods, this study focuses on the study of legal doctrines, scientific literature, and regulations related to sustainable development. The results of the study show that responsive law has the potential to become a more adaptive and participatory regulatory framework. This legal model is relevant to strengthening sustainable development policies because it supports the integration of social values, environmental protection, and intergenerational justice. However, structural challenges such as bureaucracy, regulatory inconsistency, and weak law enforcement remain obstacles to the implementation of responsive law in Indonesia. This study confirms that the application of responsive law can increase the effectiveness of sustainable development policies when developed in conjunction with the strengthening of national legal institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antasari, R. R. (2019). Telaah terhadap perkembangan tipe tatanan hukum di Indonesia perspektif pemikiran Nonet-Selznick menuju hukum yang berkeadilan. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah dan Masyarakat, 19(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v19i1.3344

Astuty, A., & Tohari, M. (2025). Analisis sosiologi hukum terhadap peran hukum dalam perubahan sosial. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 4(9), 6301–6314.

Djauzie, M. Z. (2025). Pancasila sebagai grundnorm menurut teori hukum murni Hans Kelsen dan teori hukum responsif oleh Philippe Nonet dan Philip Selznick. Jurnal Hukum To-Ra: Hukum untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 11(1), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v11i1.456

Friedman, L. M. (2009). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Musyarofah, L., & Septiani, E. (2024). Pengaruh pemikiran Philip Nonet and Selznick terhadap perkembangan hukum otonom di daerah berkembang. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Mahasiswa, 2(6), 344–352.

Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (1978). Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law. Harper & Row.

Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2007). Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law. Transaction Publishers.

Nugroho, W. (2017). Pembaruan teori hukum pembangunan ke dalam penyusunan undang-undang lingkungan hidup pasca reformasi. Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 1(2), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.24970/jbhl.v1n2.15

Rahardjo, S. (2007). Arsenal hukum progresif. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 3, 1–6.

Rahardjo, S. (2014). Sosiologi hukum: Perkembangan, masalah, dan pendekatan dalam mengkaji hukum di masyarakat. Genta Publishing.

Raharjo, S. (2023). Peradaban. Journal of Law and Society, 2(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v2i1.82

Saifullah, M. (2012). Dinamika teori hukum. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sembiring, S. N. (2023). Rekonstruksi regulasi partisipasi masyarakat dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan berbasiskan nilai-nilai keadilan (Disertasi doktor, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung).

Soenyono, S. (2011). Fungsi melayani kepentingan sosial dalam reformasi hukum menuju hukum responsif. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 2(3), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v2i3.843

Sugiono, H. (2019). Sosiologi hukum dan perkembangan teori hukum responsif. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 49(4), 812–831. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no4.2426

Sukmana, T., Ashari, Z. S., & Darmawan, Y. (n.d.). Responsive law and progressive law: Examining the legal ideas of Philip Nonet and Philip Selznick.