Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Atas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Berupa Penyatuan Harta dalam Kepailitan Perseroan

Tabitha Fransisca Romauli Nababan; Ema Nurkhaerani

doi:10.62383/desentralisasi.v2i3.761

Authors

Tabitha Fransisca Romauli Nababan Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Ema Nurkhaerani Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/desentralisasi.v2i3.761

Keywords:

bankruptcy, unlawful acts, legal liability

Abstract

This study discusses the liability of directors for unlawful acts in the form of merging personal assets with corporate assets in the context of bankruptcy of limited liability companies. Although the principle of separation of assets protects the personal assets of directors, there are conditions in which this principle can be revealed through the principle of piercing the corporate veil. The merging of personal assets by directors, which causes losses or bankruptcy of the company, can be held accountable. The Limited Liability Company Law and the Civil Code emphasize that if proven to have committed unlawful acts or negligence in carrying out their duties, directors can be sued in civil court and their assets confiscated as part of the bankruptcy estate. This study applies a normative legal approach and a literature study method to analyze legal norms and the liability of directors for losses due to bankruptcy. The aim is to provide an understanding of the legal liability mechanism for directors who abuse their authority in managing corporate assets. By applying the principle of justice, directors can be held personally responsible for the protection of creditors and fair law enforcement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antika, D. F., Rato, D., & Ali, M. (2024). Pendirian perseroan terbatas oleh suami istri menggunakan harta bersama berdasarkan asas corporate separate legal personality. ARMADA: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(12), 996–1003.

Apandi, B. H., Putri, P. A. W., Ariputra, A. R. A. R., Putri, F. M., & Aprilia, R. P. (2023). Penerapan prinsip piercing the corporate veil dalam kasus forced delisting. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 6(2), 796–811.

Haikal, M. H. (2021). Pandangan hukum positif terhadap pertanggungjawaban harta pemegang saham perseroan terbatas di Indonesia. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 1(2), 180–193.

Hartini, R. (2020). Hukum kepailitan (hlm. 5). UMMPress.

Intihani, S. N. (2022). Piercing the corporate veil doctrine implementation in limited company stockholders activities. Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie, 4(1), 101–124.

Prasetyo, R. A. (2022). Perlindungan hukum bagi perseroan terbatas atas transaksi self dealing oleh anggota direksi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. [Artikel ilmiah, institusi tidak disebutkan].

Siahaan, G. P., Sunarmi, S., Ginting, B., & Siregar, M. (2024). Akibat hukum kepailitan perseroan terbatas yang diakibatkan perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh direksi. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 3(3), 251–265.

Sinaga, L. V., & Lestari, C. I. (2021). Analisis yuridis pertanggungjawaban direksi terhadap pailitnya suatu perseroan terbatas. JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 3(1), 25–34.

Siregar, I. C., et al. (2022). Tanggung jawab dan tata kelola perseroan perorangan sebagai badan hukum baru di Indonesia. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 3(1), 26–35.

Sugandi, D., Tan, D., & Fitri, W. (2024). Perbandingan doktrin the piercing of corporate veil di berbagai negara (Indonesia, Perancis dan Jerman). Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(3), 581–598.

Suharto, A. R. (2020). Prinsip piercing the corporate veil pada perseroan terbatas sebagai badan hukum. YUSTISIA MERDEKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 6(2). [Halaman tidak tersedia, lengkapi bila ada].

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan.