Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Pemilu dan Pilkada: Antara Idealisme Konstitusi dan Praktik Politik Uang

Mustajib Mustajib

doi:10.62383/pk.v2i3.1041

Authors

Mustajib Mustajib Universitas Universitas Moch. Sroedji

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/pk.v2i3.1041

Keywords:

Democracy, General Election, Money Politics, Popular Sovereignty, Regional Election.

Abstract

The principle of popular sovereignty is a fundamental foundation of the Indonesian democratic system, as stated in Article 1, Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. Popular sovereignty emphasizes the importance of the people's right to choose and be chosen in general elections (Pemilu) and regional elections (Pilkada), which serve as the source of legitimacy for a legitimate government. This sovereignty should reflect democratic values that are just and equal. However, in practice, the implementation of popular sovereignty through elections is often tarnished by money politics, which threatens the integrity of democracy itself. This phenomenon indicates a profound distortion of democratic principles, where the election process is more driven by material interests than by political aspirations and ideologies. Money politics not only undermines the quality of elections but also diminishes public trust in the democratic process. This practice allows voters to sell their votes in exchange for money or goods, leading to electoral injustice. It transforms general elections and regional elections from an ideal democratic process into a contest reliant on financial resources, rather than on the quality of the leaders chosen. This article aims to analyze the contradiction between the constitutional ideal of popular sovereignty and the reality of money politics in the administration of general elections and regional elections. This study employs a normative juridical approach with qualitative analysis techniques to explore how current laws have guaranteed the implementation of popular sovereignty. The findings indicate that although the legal framework provides protection for the principle of popular sovereignty, weak law enforcement and the persistent transactional political culture hinder its substantial realization. As a solution, this article recommends several strategic steps, including strengthening regulations to limit money politics, reforming the party system to reduce the dominance of practical politics, and enhancing political education based on democratic values and integrity. With these measures, the principle of popular sovereignty can be more purely and consistently upheld, ultimately strengthening Indonesia’s democratic system to be fair and sustainable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amatahir, Z. (2023). Peran mahasiswa dalam mencegah politik uang dan kecurangan pemilu: The role of students in preventing money politics and election fraud. Jurnal Media Hukum, 11(2), 87-98.

Dairani, D. (2021). Sanksi tegas serta upaya hukum guna mencegah terjadinya money politic pemilu legislatif. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 167-182.

Dairani, D. (2022). Upaya konstitusional dalam memutus mata rantai dinasti politik pada pemilukada serentak tahun 2024. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 199-210.

Dairani, D. (2023). Strategi pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi pada pemilu dan pilkada serentak 2024. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 346-363.

Hetta, M. (2017). Penegakan hukum pidana terhadap kasus politik uang (money politic) dalam pemilihan umum (studi kasus pemilihan umum anggota DPR, DPD, dan DPRD tahun 2009 di Kota Payakumbuh). (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Andalas).

Hidayat, I. (2018). Ratio decidendi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang penetapan calon tunggal dalam pemilu kepala daerah. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945).

Kaharu, H. N., et al. (2025). Pemilu dan partai politik: Menuju demokrasi yang berkualitas. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Eksakta, 4(2), 146-161.

Kosasih, A. (2018). Menakar pemilihan umum kepala daerah secara demokratis. Al Imarah: Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik Islam, 2(1).

Muhtar, M. H., et al. (2024). Menimbang keadilan: Dinamika hukum dan demokrasi di persimpangan zaman. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.

Nazriyah, R. (2015). Penyelesaian sengketa pilkada setelah putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(3), 447-472.

Novianty, F., & Octavia, E. (2018). Peran Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) dalam menumbuhkan partisipasi politik bagi pemilih pemula di Kecamatan Pontianak Barat. Sosial Horizon: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial, 5(2), 293-303.

Saputro, H. (2021). Kajian yuridis normatif Bawaslu dalam pengawasan dan penindakan pelanggaran hukum pidana "money politic" pada pemilihan umum kepala daerah. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo).

Sudirman, S., & Kurnia, A. (2022). Kapitalisasi politik dalam pelaksanaan pemilu (Studi kasus praktik pemilu yang mencederai hakekat nilai demokrasi Pancasila). Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 12(2), 92-106.

Sugiharto, I. (2021). Politik uang dan permasalahan penegakan hukumnya. Penerbit Nem.

Tjenreng, M. B. Z. (2020). Demokrasi di Indonesia melalui pilkada serentak. Penerbit Papas Sinar Sinanti.

Wibowo, E. (2024). Pelaksanaan pemilihan presiden yang sesuai dengan prinsip kedaulatan rakyat dalam sistem demokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum to-ra: Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 10(2), 257-270.